Prospective Anthropometric Analysis of Sagittal Orbital-Globe Relationship following Fronto-orbital Advancement in Childhood

Craniofacial Growth in Patients With FGFR3Pro250Arg Mutation After Fronto-Orbital Advancement in Infancy

“…Measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm using the orbital anthropometer, and 1 mm with a metric ruler. 16 The goal of FOA was normalization of the sagittal orbital-globe relationship (os-acor value) as previously described. 16 The subsequent need for and type of revision was predicated on the os-acor relationship.…”

“…16 The goal of FOA was normalization of the sagittal orbital-globe relationship (os-acor value) as previously described. 16 The subsequent need for and type of revision was predicated on the os-acor relationship. Frontal readvancement was performed if os-acor was negative, and foreheadplasty was done for irregularity or asymmetry of the frontal contour in the setting of a nearly normal os-acor.…”

Identical Twins with Crouzon Syndrome: Eight-Year Follow-up, Genetic Considerations, and Operative Management

“…Given the differences in the shape of the forehead between the two girls, these implants had to be significantly different to achieve similar postoperative results. Implant projection was based on the normal distance between brow and anterior corneal distance as demonstrated by Pai et al 16 Both patients underwent the operation during the same week to facilitate family needs and postoperative recovery (►Figs. 2 and 3).…”