2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64167-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Comparison of Computerized Tomography and Excretory Urography in the Initial Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microhematuria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of haematuria (either macroscopic or microscopic) warrants investigation of both the upper and lower urinary tracts. It was suggested that the two imaging methods of the upper tracts (IVU and US) could be replaced by one CTU scan, which is more sensitive [9]. The present study showed that, with the correct protocol, CTU can accurately detect bladder tumours in patients with haematuria, and should be considered as a possible single noninvasive screening investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The presence of haematuria (either macroscopic or microscopic) warrants investigation of both the upper and lower urinary tracts. It was suggested that the two imaging methods of the upper tracts (IVU and US) could be replaced by one CTU scan, which is more sensitive [9]. The present study showed that, with the correct protocol, CTU can accurately detect bladder tumours in patients with haematuria, and should be considered as a possible single noninvasive screening investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A recent meta‐analysis of published literature on CT urography highlights a pooled sensitivity 96% and a pooled specificity of 99%[16]. This compares very favourably with the reported sensitivities for excretory urography, which are in the range 50–60%[17,18]. An additional technological advance in the past three decades has been improvements in ureteroscopy (URS).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…CT urography has high diagnostic accuracy for urothelial cancers compared with excretory urography [29,31–33] but has the disadvantage of a higher radiation exposure of 20.1 mSv compared with 11.9 mSv for excretory urography [34]. The improvement in diagnostic capabilities outweighs the use of increased radiation dose for CT urography in this population group with a prevalence of UUT and LUT cancer of 25% [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%