2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

Abstract: EUS-FNA-based cytology is safe and has only limited value for the differential diagnosis of submucosal tumors, mainly because insufficient material is harvested. Better tissue acquisition techniques are necessary for better differential diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
135
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
135
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, surgical excision is generally recommended for SETs that are [5 cm, and histologic assessment is necessary for SETs between 2 and 5 cm [13]. EUS-FNA has been recommended for histologic assessment; however, the diagnostic efficacy of this technique appears to be limited [14]. Recently, EUS-guided SINK biopsy has been reported to be an easy, safe, and effective technique for the diagnosis of SETs [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, surgical excision is generally recommended for SETs that are [5 cm, and histologic assessment is necessary for SETs between 2 and 5 cm [13]. EUS-FNA has been recommended for histologic assessment; however, the diagnostic efficacy of this technique appears to be limited [14]. Recently, EUS-guided SINK biopsy has been reported to be an easy, safe, and effective technique for the diagnosis of SETs [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both FNA and TCB have low diagnostic yields of 34-63 % [14,[17][18][19]. Also, technical failure was observed in 18 % of FNA cases and 14 % of TCB cases [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous prospective trials attempted to identify EUS signs of malignancy [47,48] and recorded the accuracy of EUS-FNA and EUS trucut biopsy in sampling gastrointestinal stromal and other submucosal tumors (IIb) [49,50], yet conclusions are discordant and data from controlled or randomized studies are warranted. A continuous effort to expand EUS applications is reflected on the considerable number of studies regarding emerging and other indications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, endoscopic biopsy performed using standard biopsy forceps most often leads to unremarkable results. Recently, the use of EUS-FNA has emerged as an important diagnostic technique for SMT (23). However, as this method exhibits limited diagnostic accuracy due to the small amount of tissue that can be collected, an improved method, such as ESD-based intervention or surgery, is required for tissue sampling (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%