2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective comparison of handheld pneumatic otoscopy, binocular microscopy, and tympanometry in identifying middle ear effusions in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests to predict MEE that are presently recommended in accepted clinical guidelines include pneumatic otoscopy and either 226‐Hz tympanometry or reflectometry when the results of pneumatic otoscopy are questionable 25. Although meta‐analysis has reported good sensitivity and specificity for pneumatic otoscopy in making predictions of MEE,27 it has produced variable inter‐ and intratester results 29, 34, 35. The performance of each WATF predictor is quantified in the present study by AUC and SYM values, which is not reported in the literature for pneumatic otoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tests to predict MEE that are presently recommended in accepted clinical guidelines include pneumatic otoscopy and either 226‐Hz tympanometry or reflectometry when the results of pneumatic otoscopy are questionable 25. Although meta‐analysis has reported good sensitivity and specificity for pneumatic otoscopy in making predictions of MEE,27 it has produced variable inter‐ and intratester results 29, 34, 35. The performance of each WATF predictor is quantified in the present study by AUC and SYM values, which is not reported in the literature for pneumatic otoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Nevertheless, the WATF test has the option of obtaining pressurized responses if desired 45. In addition, pneumatic otoscopy is characterized by variability in interpretation,29, 34, 35 and tympanometry may not be suitable for detecting slight changes in middle‐ear mechanics that result from MEE because it tests at only a single frequency 42. The WATF test overcomes these limitations by providing an objective assessment of middle‐ear function across a broad frequency region (0.25–8 kHz) while also maintaining good test‐retest reliability46, 55 and a short test time 45.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Para el examen de oídos, los participantes fueron estudiados por un especialista en Otorrinolaringología en el Hospital General de Agudos "Parmenio Piñero" mediante microotoscopía binocular, instrumento de alta sensibilidad en la detección de patologías otológicas. 28 El examen de audición fue llevado a cabo mediante audiometría tonal por juego (Audiómetro Kamplex® AD 229) en el Hospital de Rehabilitación "Manuel Rocca". En caso de dificultades con la colaboración del participante, se realizó una audiometría en campo libre o por refuerzo visual.…”
Section: Población Y Métodosunclassified
“…Although much is known about comparisons of diVerent models of tympanometer in measuring ear pressure [12] and about the correlation between tympanometry and other otoscopic and microscopic modalities in identifying middle ear eVusions [13], there is little research examining the basic accuracy of the tympanometer in measuring ear canal volume. This study examines the potential of the tympanometer as an objective experimental tool to assess the eVectiveness of cerumenolytics in laboratory and human studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%