2014
DOI: 10.1097/jto.0000000000000161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective CT Screening for Lung Cancer in a High-Risk Population: HIV-Positive Smokers

Abstract: Background Epidemiological evidence suggests HIV-infected individuals are at increased risk of lung cancer, but no data exist since large CT screening trials routinely exclude HIV-infected participants. Methods From 2006–2013, we conducted the first lung cancer screening trial of 224 HIV-infected current/former smokers to assess the CT detection rates of lung cancer. We also used 130 HIV-infected patients with known lung cancer to determine radiographic markers of lung cancer risk using multivariate analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
2
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
30
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the high risk profile of smoking HIV-positive individuals, 2 studies tested the survival benefit using routine LDCT scans in PLWHIV. The results of the first study screening 224 heavily smoking PLWHIV did not show a clinical advantage, finding only 1 LC case per 678 person-years, which was markedly below the results of an earlier study [61]. The younger age (median 48 years) of the participants might have contributed to this outcome, but given the described younger age at LC onset in PLWHIV, this explanation seems rather unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Preventioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…In view of the high risk profile of smoking HIV-positive individuals, 2 studies tested the survival benefit using routine LDCT scans in PLWHIV. The results of the first study screening 224 heavily smoking PLWHIV did not show a clinical advantage, finding only 1 LC case per 678 person-years, which was markedly below the results of an earlier study [61]. The younger age (median 48 years) of the participants might have contributed to this outcome, but given the described younger age at LC onset in PLWHIV, this explanation seems rather unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Preventioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Two lung cancer screening clinical trials using chest CT in HIV infected smokers have been published to date[74, 75]. The first study was conducted in Baltimore between 2006 and 2013, and enrolled a cohort with significant smoking history (median 34 pack-years) but was younger than the NLST (median age 48) [74].…”
Section: Lung Cancer Prevention and Early Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first study was conducted in Baltimore between 2006 and 2013, and enrolled a cohort with significant smoking history (median 34 pack-years) but was younger than the NLST (median age 48) [74]. Baseline screen positivity (a general measure of harms associated with screening, as most positive screens are false-positives) was broadly similar to NLST (14%).…”
Section: Lung Cancer Prevention and Early Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In total, 224 HIV-infected (current or former smokers) underwent LDCT screening to assess the computer tomography (CT) detection rate for lung cancer. 21 None of the pulmonary nodules detected in 48 participants at baseline were diagnosed as cancer by study end, and only one cancer was detected in 678 patient-years. This may have been because of the young age of the screened population.…”
Section: Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%