2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective evaluation of airway management in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A qualitative analysis of five studies (2 RCTs, 1 CCT, and 2 observational) indicated no difference in the majority of reported harms between BVM and ETI (17,(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)38). One study reported a lower rate of regurgitation for ETI compared with BVM; 7.7% difference (95% CI 4.9 to 10.4), p<0.001 (33).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A qualitative analysis of five studies (2 RCTs, 1 CCT, and 2 observational) indicated no difference in the majority of reported harms between BVM and ETI (17,(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)38). One study reported a lower rate of regurgitation for ETI compared with BVM; 7.7% difference (95% CI 4.9 to 10.4), p<0.001 (33).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A qualitative analysis of four studies (2 RCTs and 2 observational) indicated no difference in the majority of reported harms between BVM and SGA (SOE: Moderate) (14,17,21,25). One study reported lower rates of aspiration pneumonia within 72 hours with use of BVM versus SGA (5% vs. 33%) (17).…”
Section: Data For Neurological Function Measured By the Cerebral Performance Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequent to that trial, supraglottic airway devices have influenced prehospital airway management, 17,18 but there are limited available data on prehospital supraglottic airways in children. 19,20 These observations collectively support the need for new data to inform the best practices for prehospital pediatric airway management. However, taking a traditional approach would require multiple trials conducted across a vast network of EMS systems, with a large sample size, incurring significant cost, and may still not provide a definitive answer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Hansen et al, for instance, reported on airway management in 155 children, as part of a prospective observational study (2016-2018) from ten EMS agencies in 2 US metropolitan areas, showing TI still to be the most common airway management modality, despite a success rate of only 65.7%. 5 On the other hand, Nevin et al specifically looked at highly trained physician-led prehospital trauma teams and reported only a single failed TI in 315 prehospital intubations (81% RSI -19% peri-arrest). 6 Even if we do not know what 'success' really means when talking about advanced airway management nor how this relates to important outcomes, such a difference is significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%