2003
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000087360.91794.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Bruit as a Predictor of First Stroke in Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: Background and Purpose-We sought to examine prospectively the relationship between asymptomatic carotid bruit and stroke in type 2 diabetes. Methods-We studied 1181 (91.3%) of a community-based sample of 1294 patients with type 2 diabetes. These patients had no history of cerebrovascular disease at recruitment during 1993-1996 and were followed until the end of January 2002. Hospital morbidity and death register data relating to cerebrovascular events were also available. Cox proportional hazards models were u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of hospitalisations between MSU screening and the end of June 2003 were obtained from the WA Data Linkage System [6], which includes details of all WA hospital separations and deaths. Hospitalisations with urosepsis were identified from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th revision (ICD-9-CM) or 10th revision (ICD-10-AM) codes for UTI, cystitis, pyelonephritis, orchitis, epididymitis and prostatitis, as either principal diagnosis (that immediately responsible for admission) or secondary diagnosis (contributing to, but not the major cause of, hospitalisation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of hospitalisations between MSU screening and the end of June 2003 were obtained from the WA Data Linkage System [6], which includes details of all WA hospital separations and deaths. Hospitalisations with urosepsis were identified from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th revision (ICD-9-CM) or 10th revision (ICD-10-AM) codes for UTI, cystitis, pyelonephritis, orchitis, epididymitis and prostatitis, as either principal diagnosis (that immediately responsible for admission) or secondary diagnosis (contributing to, but not the major cause of, hospitalisation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were classified as having coronary heart disease (CHD) if there was a self-reported history of myocardial infarction, angina, coronary artery bypass grafting or angioplasty, or if pathological Q waves were present on the electrocardiograph (20). Stroke was determined from self-report and hospital discharge data (21).…”
Section: Research Design Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients completed a supplementary questionnaire which contained questions relating to (1) conditions predisposing to osteoporosis (family history, hepatic and renal disease, thyroid and parathyroid disease, inflammatory conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, malabsorption, glucocorticoid use, menopausal status and use of hormone replacement therapy [HRT]); (2) details of past fractures; (3) prior use of any treatment for osteoporosis or any medication influencing bone metabolism; and (4) details of previous bone density measurements. Additional data on fractures were obtained from hospitalisations recorded in the Western Australian Data Linkage System [23].…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subject was considered as having retinopathy if any grade of retinopathy, including maculopathy, was detected by direct and/or indirect ophthalmoscopy in one or both eyes and/or on more detailed assessment by an ophthalmologist. Self-reported stroke and transient ischaemic attack were amalgamated with prior hospitalisations to define baseline cerebrovascular disease status [23]. Patients were classified as having CHD if there was a self-reported history of, or hospitalisation for, myocardial infarction, angina, coronary artery bypass grafting, angioplasty, and/or definite myocardial infarction on a Minnesota-coded electrocardiogram [25].…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%