Background: Digital single-operator cholangioscopes (digital SOCs), equipped with an improved image quality, have been recently introduced. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of digital SOCs (Spyglass TM DS). Methods: Sixty-seven digital SOC procedures performed between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The most frequent indications for examination were indeterminate biliary strictures (61.2%) and biliary stone disease (23.9%). In 25 patients (37.3), visual findings predicted malignancy with a sensitivity of 88.9%, a specificity of 97.6%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.0% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.9%. For histological analysis, forceps biopsies were performed in 29 patients (43.2%). Compared with visual findings, forceps biopsies yield a lower diagnostic efficacy in diagnosing malignancy (sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 90.0%, PPV 90.9%, NPV 60.0%). Therapeutic interventions were performed in 19 patients with a technical success rate of 89.4%. Adverse events were observed in 17 patients (25.4%). Of these, 11 patients (16.4%) suffered from severe adverse events (pancreatitis, cholangitis or major bleeding), which led to a prolonged hospital stay. Conclusion: Digital SOCs have excellent diagnostic and therapeutic efficacies, but are accompanied by high rates of adverse events; therefore, physicians should use digital SOCs in carefully selected cases.
KeywordsCholangioscopy, SpyGlass DS, adverse events, digital single-operator cholangioscopy, indeterminate biliary strictures, complex biliary stone disease Received: 25 November 2017; accepted: 12 February 2018
Key summaryEstablished knowledge:. Digital single-operator cholangioscopes (digital SOCs) have been recently introduced.
New findings:. Digital SOCs have an excellent diagnostic accuracy for biliary tract diseases and a high efficacy for therapeutic interventions including treatment of complex biliary stone disease and biliary strictures. . Our results suggest a high incidence (16.4%) of severe adverse events associated with the examination, which is why digital SOCs should only be used in carefully selected cases.