2000
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/72.2.407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective evaluation of growth, nutritional status, and body composition in children with cystic fibrosis

Abstract: Despite comprehensive care, the growth of boys with CF was impaired on the basis of height, fat-free mass, and fat mass, when observed longitudinally. Caution should be used when interpreting cross-sectional measurements because they often do not detect suboptimal growth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
26
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth impairment is still common in CF children [3, 21, 22]. In our study, the CF children were shorter and lighter than the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Growth impairment is still common in CF children [3, 21, 22]. In our study, the CF children were shorter and lighter than the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…13 In contrast, the growth of boys with CF was impaired on the basis of height, fat free mass, and fat mass when observed longitudinally. 14 In the study by Corey et al, male patients had milder disease than females, as reflected by a smaller decline in FEV 1 , decreased mortality, and higher survival. 22 No significant differences between males and females have been found in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Longitudinal studies of BMD from childhood to adulthood may help to identify whether the sex bias in survival, or other factors, such as greater nutritional imbalances in males, are responsible for the observed sex differences in BMD in adults with CF. There is evidence suggesting that males with CF experience greater nutritional deficits than do females [27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%