2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2007.00364.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Evaluation of Techniques for Differentiating Shoulder Pathology As a Source of Forelimb Lameness in Medium and Large Breed Dogs

Abstract: The diagnostic approach to forelimb lameness in dogs should include shoulder pathology as a differential with multiple assessments used to determine the clinical cause of lameness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
76
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Shoulder instability is a cause of chronic forelimb lameness in dogs . The shoulder joint is stabilized by dynamic and static mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shoulder instability is a cause of chronic forelimb lameness in dogs . The shoulder joint is stabilized by dynamic and static mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthopedic conditions of the shoulder joint are an important cause of thoracic limb lameness in the dog. [1][2][3][4] Articular and comminuted fractures of the proximal aspect of the humerus or distal aspect of the scapula have a guarded prognosis after surgical repair, with approximately 50% of articular scapular fractures resulting in long-term lameness. 5,6 Management of recurrent shoulder luxations may be similarly challenging, with a high incidence of reluxation or persistent instability.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, diseases involving the shoulder joint and adjacent structures should be excluded as causes of thoracic limb lameness. 26 CT and more recently MRI scans are increasingly used to evaluate elbows where changes are equivocal on radiographic assessment 27 ; however, arthroscopic evaluation constitutes the most important single interrogation directing our decision-making process for MCD with or without pathology of the medial aspect of the humeral condyle. We have observed equivocal findings on both CT and MRI where subchondral pathology was subsequently proven by histologic examination of coronoid specimens after arthroscopically identified MCD.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%