1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00409-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Identification of Myocardial Stunning Using Technetium-99m Sestamibi–Based Measurements of Infarct Size

Abstract: Perfusion imaging with Tc-99m-sestamibi can identify post-MI patients at hospital discharge in whom LV function is discordant with the measured infarct size. Patients with stunning have late increases in LVEF; patients with hyperkinesia have late decreases. This methodology, performed at discharge, is predictive of late changes in LV function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the uptake and retention of 99m Tc-sestamibi do not appear to be affected by stunning (15,16), reperfused but stunned myocardium areas may explain perfusioncontraction mismatch observed in patients with acute MI. As previously reported by Christian et al (17), 25% of patients with acute MI had a "mismatch stunned" pattern, meaning that these patients had an LVEF lower than expected by their infarct size at hospital discharge owing to myocardial stunning, and these patients showed a late increase in the LVEF. The apparent paradox with respect to univariate analysis is caused by the concomitant presence of myocardial salvage in the multivariable analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Because the uptake and retention of 99m Tc-sestamibi do not appear to be affected by stunning (15,16), reperfused but stunned myocardium areas may explain perfusioncontraction mismatch observed in patients with acute MI. As previously reported by Christian et al (17), 25% of patients with acute MI had a "mismatch stunned" pattern, meaning that these patients had an LVEF lower than expected by their infarct size at hospital discharge owing to myocardial stunning, and these patients showed a late increase in the LVEF. The apparent paradox with respect to univariate analysis is caused by the concomitant presence of myocardial salvage in the multivariable analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…28 However, the advantages afforded by increasing the extent of myocardial salvage take time to become clinically apparent, because of the persistence of myocardial stunning with reperfusion therapy. 36 On the basis of our findings, a new reperfusion strategy such as combining stenting with abciximab yields a significantly greater degree of myocardial salvage and a better clinical outcome at six months than does a conventional strategy of fibrinolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…80,81 Ito et al 80 measured ischemic risk zone in patients by performing myocardial contrast echocardiography before reperfusion and simultaneously measuring serial endocardial length of the zone of abnormal contraction assessed by echocardiography. They measured a ratio of endocardial length of abnormal contraction to that of the contrast defect.…”
Section: Clinical Evidence For Stunned Myocardiummentioning
confidence: 99%