Prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of student justifications and generalizations in the context of analyzing written artifacts and video-records

Abstract

Background This paper contributes to current discussions about supporting prospective teachers (PSTs) in developing skills of noticing students’ mathematical thinking. We draw attention to PSTs’ initial noticing skills (prior to instruction focused on supporting noticing) as PSTs engage in analyzing written artifacts of student work and video-records. We examined and compared PSTs’ noticing skills as they analyzed how students reason about, generalize, and justify generalizations of figural patterns given student written work and video records. We identified aspects of student thinking about generalizations and justifications, which PSTs addressed and interpreted. We also examined how PSTs respond to students as they analyze student thinking given written artifacts of student work or video-records of small group discussions, and we identified the foci of PSTs’ responding practice. Results Our data revealed that PSTs’ initial noticing skills of student generalizations and justifications differed while accounting for ways in which student thinking was externalized (written work or video-records). PSTs’ attending-and-interpreting and their responding practices were focused on mathematically significant aspects of student thinking to a greater extent in the context of analyzing written artifacts compared to video records. While analyzing students’ written work, PSTs demonstrated greater attention to ways in which students analyzed patterns, students’ generalization strategies, and justifications linked to an understanding of the pattern structure, compared to analyzing student thinking captured via videos. Conclusion Our results document that without providing any intentional support for PSTs’ noticing skills, PSTs are more deliberate to focus on mathematically significant aspects of student thinking while analyzing written artifacts of student work compared to video-records. We believe that the analysis of student written work might demand from PSTs to be more analytical. While examining written representations, PSTs have to reconstruct students’ reasoning. Unlike the videos where the students tell or use gestures to express their thinking, written work provides fewer clues about student thinking. Thus, written work demands a deeper level of engagement from PSTs as they strive to understand student reasoning. Our study extends research on PSTs’ noticing skills by documenting differences in PSTs’ noticing in relation to the nature of artifacts of student work that PSTs analyze. Our work also adds to prior research on PSTs’ noticing by characterizing specific aspects of students’ thinking about pattern generalizations and justifications that PSTs address as they analyze student thinking and respond to students.

Students’ Mathematical Generalization in Solving Numeracy Problems

“…Based on the work written by SKR-01 and SKR-02, subjects with low mathematical generalization ability category have used only some phases of Mason's generalization. Students with low mathematical generalization ability only meet two phases: Perception of generalization and Expression of generalization (Magiera & Zambak, 2021;Setiawan et al, 2020).…”

Examination of a middle School mathematics preservice teacher’s interpretation skills

“…They identified that five preservice teachers teaching competence levels varied from not identifying any characteristics of students' understanding of pattern generalization to identifying different characteristics of students' understanding in detail. Also, Magiera and Zambak (2021) investigated preservice K-8 teachers' professional noticing of students' justifications and generalizations of figural patterns by using written artifacts and video-records. They found that preservice teachers provided more details about mathematically significant aspects of students' thinking when they analyzed students' written work compared to the video-records.…”