2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective memory affects satisfaction with the contraceptive pill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there has been a considerable interest in prospective memory in the last two decades, the main focus was on episodic prospective memory tasks. In particular, the question whether remembering an episodic prospective memory task can occur spontaneously or whether strategic monitoring for the retrieval occasion is necessary is at the core of the current theoretical debate (see McDaniel and Einstein, 2007; Kliegel et al, 2008 for overviews).Only a few studies were concerned with habitual prospective memory (Einstein et al, 1998; Elvevag et al, 2003; Vedhara et al, 2004; Matter and Meier, 2008; Cuttler and Graf, 2009) and these studies were mainly concerned with habitual prospective memory performance deficits in older adults and in patient populations, or with questions related to medication adherence. However, none of these studies has examined the neural correlates of habitual prospective memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been a considerable interest in prospective memory in the last two decades, the main focus was on episodic prospective memory tasks. In particular, the question whether remembering an episodic prospective memory task can occur spontaneously or whether strategic monitoring for the retrieval occasion is necessary is at the core of the current theoretical debate (see McDaniel and Einstein, 2007; Kliegel et al, 2008 for overviews).Only a few studies were concerned with habitual prospective memory (Einstein et al, 1998; Elvevag et al, 2003; Vedhara et al, 2004; Matter and Meier, 2008; Cuttler and Graf, 2009) and these studies were mainly concerned with habitual prospective memory performance deficits in older adults and in patient populations, or with questions related to medication adherence. However, none of these studies has examined the neural correlates of habitual prospective memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La primera distinción entre memoria prospectiva y retrospectiva fue realizada por Meacham y Leiman (1982). Desde entonces, su delimitación conceptual se ha convertido en un requisito necesario para generar nuevas iniciativas de investigación (Graff y Uttl, 2001), así como para adecuar su análisis a los objetivos clínicos y diagnósticos presentes de manera recurrente en la literatura científica de los últimos años, que van desde la interacción entre la MP y diferentes procesos cognitivos (Basso, Ferrari y Palladino, 2010;McFarland y Glisky, 2009), hasta su relación con un heterogéneo grupo de patologías y tópicos de la problemática social −esquizofrenia (Chan et al, 2008;Twamley et al, 2008;Ungvari, Xiang, Tang y Shum, 2008;Wang et al, 2010); esclerosis múltiple (Adda, Castro, Além-Mar e Silva, de Manreza y Kashiara, 2008); Alzheimer (Livner, Laukka, Karlsson y Bäckman, 2009); Parkinson (Foster, McDaniel, Repovŝ y Hershey, 2009); SIDA (Woods et al, 2008); retraso mental (Meilán, Salgado, Arana, Carro y Jenaro, 2008); ingesta de alcohol (Heffernan, Clark, Bartholomew, Ling y Stephens, 2010); métodos anticonceptivos (Matter y Meier, 2008) −. Se conforma así, un marco teórico amplio y heterogéneo, donde la MP es analizada a diferentes niveles, y donde distintos procesos cognitivos participan en las fases que conforman el procesamiento de la intención.…”
unclassified