2008
DOI: 10.1037/a0013211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective memory and the efficacy of a memory strategy in multiple sclerosis.

Abstract: Prospective memory (PM), which is the ability to remember to carry out actions that are planned for the future, plays an important role in professional and social life as well as in activities of daily living. This study examined PM performance among adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) and evaluated the efficacy of a mnemonic strategy, implementation intentions. Compared to controls, adults with MS were impaired on PM, both in terms of acting when encountering the correct circumstances (prospective component) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
60
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, 18 articles concerned 15 studies with a patient population and stated that an implementation intention had been used [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. Two articles were excluded as they described the development of an intervention, an RCT protocol and its feasibility testing [63,64].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of these, 18 articles concerned 15 studies with a patient population and stated that an implementation intention had been used [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. Two articles were excluded as they described the development of an intervention, an RCT protocol and its feasibility testing [63,64].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, five had not used an RCT methodology [54,56,59,62,64]. These studies will be further discussed in the discussion section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eight studies were conducted in community settings and one was conducted in a rehabilitation hospital. Allen et al (1995) Did not use external memory aids Allen et al (1998) Did not use external memory aids Beer and Kesselring (2009) Did not evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention Ben Ari et al (2012) Conference abstract; full article not yet published; data not available from author Brissart et al (2010) Did not use external memory aids Brissart et al (2011) Did not use external memory aids Brissart et al (2013) Did not use external memory aids das Nair et al (2012) Did not evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention Gich et al (2011) Did not use external memory aids Johnson et al (2009) Did not evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention Kardiasmenos et al (2008) Did not use external memory aids Kesselring (2004) Did not evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention Mantynen et al (2014) Did not use external memory aids Ramio et al (2010) Did not use external memory aids Rosti-Otajarvi and Hamalainen…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These excluded studies are summarised in Table 2. Five studies were excluded as they did not evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention (Beer & Kesselring, 2009;Johnson, Bamer, Yorkston, & Amtmann, 2009;Kesselring, 2004;Rosti-Otajarvi & Hama-lainen, 2011), 11 studies did not instruct participants on the use of external memory aids (Allen, Goldstein, Heyman, & Rondinelli, 1998;Allen, Longmore, & Goldstein, 1995;Brissart, Leroy, & Debouverie, 2010;Brissart, Leroy, Morele, Baumann, & Debouv-erie, 2011;Brissart et al, 2013;Gich et al, 2011;Kardiasmenos, Clawson, Wilken, & Wallin, 2008;Mantynen et al, 2014;Ramio et al, 2010;Solari et al, 2004;Topcular et al, 2010), and one study had been presented as a work in progress at a conference and was not yet published and the data were not available from the author (Ben Ari, Hertzman, Mosberg-Galili, & Hellmann, 2012).…”
Section: Excluded Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%