Prospective Memory, Working Memory, Retrospective Memory and Self-Rated Memory Performance in Persons with Intellectual Disability

Levén, Anna; Lyxell, Björn; Andersson, Jessica; Danielsson, Henrik; Rönnberg, Jerker

doi:10.1080/15017410802144444

Cited by 24 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, we can infer that the expression of contextual cueing is not directly related to working memory limitations. In addition, there are well documented variations in cognitive control that are related to age (e.g., De Neys & Van Gelder, 2009, Trick & Enns, 1998 and IQ (e.g., Conners, Carr, & Willis, 1998;Danielsson, Henry, Rö nnberg, & Nilsson, 2010;Levé n, Lyxell, Andersson, Danielsson, & Rö nnberg, 2008). The fact that we found fairly equivalent contextual cueing effects across age and IQ indicates that the mechanisms responsible for cognitive control do not impact the expression of contextual cueing.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 54%

The acquisition of contextual cueing effects by persons with and without intellectual disability

Merrill¹,

Conners²,

Yang³

et al. 2014

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 54%

The acquisition of contextual cueing effects by persons with and without intellectual disability

Merrill¹,

Conners²,

Yang³

et al. 2014

Research in Developmental Disabilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Overall, there is some evidence for MA-appropriate performance on EF tasks in children with ID, yet when we look at performance levels in relation to typically developing comparison groups matched for CA, research findings are consistent: children with ID have lower EF abilities than CA comparisons (e.g. Connors et al, 1998;Levén, Lyxell, Andersson, Danielsson & Rönnberg, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 81%

Strengths and weaknesses in executive functioning in children with intellectual disability

Danielsson

Henry

Messer

et al. 2012

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Self Cite

119

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Many studies have also shown below CA comparison group performance for persons with ID (e.g. Connors et al, 1998;Levén, Lyxell, Andersson, Danielsson & Rönnberg, 2008). There is however one study that has found contradictory results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Executive functions in individuals with intellectual disability

Danielsson

Henry

Rönnberg

et al. 2010

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

581 83 Linköping, Sweden, or henrik.danielsson@liu.se. Telephone +46 13 28 21 99 and fax +46 13 28 21 45. Executive Functions in Intellectual Disability 2 AbstractThe aim of the present study was to investigate executive functions in adults with intellectual disability, and compare them to a closely matched control group longitudinally for 5 years. In the Betula database, a group of adults with intellectual disability (ID, n=46) was defined from measures of verbal and nonverbal IQ. A control group, with two people for every person with intellectual disability (n=92), was chosen by matching on the following criterion in order of priority: IQ higher than 85, age, sex, sample, level of education, and years of education. 3 types of tasks of executive functions were included on 2 occasions, with 5 years between testing sessions: The Tower of Hanoi, executively loaded dual task versions of word recall, and verbal fluency. Adults with ID showed significant impairments on verbal fluency and on the executively loaded dual task word recall task (at encoding but not at recall). There were no group differences on the Tower of Hanoi. No significant differences between the 2 test occasions were found. The results are interpreted in terms of individuals with ID having problems with speed of accessing lexical items and difficulties with working memory-related executive control at encoding, which includes shifting between tasks. There are, however, not necessarily problems with inhibition. The dual task results additionally imply that the adults with intellectual disability were more sensitive to strategy interruptions at encoding, but that dividing attention at recall did not have such detrimental effects.

show abstract

Prospective Memory, Working Memory, Retrospective Memory and Self-Rated Memory Performance in Persons with Intellectual Disability

Cited by 24 publications

References 39 publications

The acquisition of contextual cueing effects by persons with and without intellectual disability

The acquisition of contextual cueing effects by persons with and without intellectual disability

Strengths and weaknesses in executive functioning in children with intellectual disability

Executive functions in individuals with intellectual disability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About