2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07377.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective monitoring of BCR‐ABL1 transcript levels in patients with Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia undergoing imatinib‐combined chemotherapy

Abstract: Summary The clinical significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) is uncertain in patients with Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph+ ALL) treated with imatinib‐combined chemotherapy. Here we report the results of prospective MRD monitoring in 100 adult patients. Three hundred and sixty‐seven follow‐up bone marrow samples, collected at predefined time points during a uniform treatment protocol, were analysed for BCR‐ABL1 transcripts by quantitative reverse transcription polymera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 However, it remains controversial whether BCR/ABL-based MRD monitoring pre and post HSCT continues to serve as an efficient tool for risk stratification after HSCT. [27][28][29][30] Our study demonstrates the prognostic relevance of MRD kinetics to relapse and strongly supports a prior report from the GMALL Study Group, 28 which found that patients with the appearance of BCR/ABL transcripts early ( o100 days) and/or at higher levels (410 − 3 ) after allo-HSCT show a limited benefit from imatinib treatment. Unlike a previous study by Lee et al, 27 our data indicate that MRD status pre HSCT is not significantly correlated with recurrence post HSCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…25,26 However, it remains controversial whether BCR/ABL-based MRD monitoring pre and post HSCT continues to serve as an efficient tool for risk stratification after HSCT. [27][28][29][30] Our study demonstrates the prognostic relevance of MRD kinetics to relapse and strongly supports a prior report from the GMALL Study Group, 28 which found that patients with the appearance of BCR/ABL transcripts early ( o100 days) and/or at higher levels (410 − 3 ) after allo-HSCT show a limited benefit from imatinib treatment. Unlike a previous study by Lee et al, 27 our data indicate that MRD status pre HSCT is not significantly correlated with recurrence post HSCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These results confirm the observations made in our previous study based on the use of dasatinib in induction, 16 and are in line with the current general knowledge on the prognostic impact of MRD. 12,19,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Furthermore, they strengthen the notion that MRD negativity should be regarded as a major goal in Ph + ALL treatment. Indeed, with few exceptions, 20,38 it is now well established that BCR-ABL1 transcript levels correlate with response.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…12,19,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Furthermore, they strengthen the notion that MRD negativity should be regarded as a major goal in Ph + ALL treatment. Indeed, with few exceptions, 20,38 it is now well established that BCR-ABL1 transcript levels correlate with response. Lee et al 37 were able to demonstrate that a 3-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 transcripts after one month of imatinib treatment strongly predicted a reduced risk of relapse and confirmed these results in a subsequent study.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…In the imatinib era, only limited information is available regarding the prognostic impact of MRD level on treatment outcome in adult Ph-positive ALL. Yanada et al 26 conducted a prospective MRD monitoring in adults with Ph-positive ALL treated with imatinib-combined chemotherapy (including both transplants and non-transplants) and reported upon the prognostic significance of MRD level at the end of induction (n ¼ 86 (day 28) and n ¼ 85 (day 63)) and after first consolidation (n ¼ 75). However, in their study, neither PCR negativity at the end of induction nor after consolidation was associated with a lower relapse rate or survival advantage (median follow-up 3.2 years), although patients whose MRD levels exceeded 1000 copies per mg had trends toward a higher relapse rate (P ¼ 0.070).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%