Prospective pilot study on the incidence of infections caused by peripheral venous catheters at a general surgical ward

Heinrich, I.; Geßner, Stephan; Wegner, Christian; Heidecke, Claus–Dieter; Krämer, Axel

doi:10.3205/dgkh000206

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Up to now, the CVC has been seen as the more invasive device, which is why catheter-associated infections (especially sepsis) have been perceived as a risk primarily in connection with CVCs. However, more recent studies have shown that the use of PVC also represents a relevant risk due to the frequency of use [ 4 ]. These complications can be caused by inflammation at the entry site [ 5 ] or bacterially superinfected thrombophlebitis [ 6 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Compliance assessment regarding the PVC management on normal wards of a university hospital

Rusinovich¹,

Rusinovich

Chaberny³

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The risk of peripheral venous catheter (PVC) infections in inpatients is often underestimated, even if it is lower than that for central venous catheters. Guidelines for the prevention of PVC-associated infections describe the evidence-based management of PVCs. The aims of this study were the development of standardized methods for compliance assessment regarding PVC management and the evaluation of self-reported knowledge and implementations among healthcare providers regarding PVC care. Method: We developed a checklist based on the recommendation of the Commission of Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention at the Robert Koch Institute (KRINKO) Berlin for the standardized evaluation of PVC management. The following parameters were collected and evaluated: condition of the puncture site, condition of the bandage, presence of an extension set, presence of a plug, and documentation. The checklist was applied in 14 normal wards in 2019. After feedback of the ward staff on the results, it was applied again in 2020 in the same wards. For retrospective data analysis, we used a newly developed PVC-quality index. After the second evaluation in 2020, we carried out an anonymous survey among the healthcare providers. Results: The evaluation of 627 indwelling PVCs showed a significant increase in compliance related to the presence of an extension set (p=0.049) and documentation (p<0.001) in the 2nd year. The quality index increased in 12 out of 14 wards. The participants of the survey were aware of the in-house standard “Prevention of vascular catheter-associated infections”, with a mean score of 4.98 on a Likert scale (1=not aware, 7=completely aware). The main barrier to implementation of the preventive measures was the time factor. Survey participants were more aware of PVC placement than PVC care. Conclusion: The PVC quality index is a valuable tool for the assessment of compliance regarding PVC management in daily practice. Feedback from the ward staff on the results of compliance assessment improves PVC management, but the outcome is very heterogeneous.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%