Prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing intense endoscopic cleaning versus minimal intervention in the early post-operative period following functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Fishman, Jonathan; Sood, S; Chaudhari, Meena; Martinez‐Devesa, Pablo; Orr, Louis M.; Gupta, Deepak

doi:10.1017/s0022215111000508

Cited by 12 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This can be uncomfortable for patients particularly in the immediate postoperative period. In addition, there are a few of studies that question the benefits of early, aggressive debridement . These studies have shown no difference in outcomes in patients that underwent regular debridement compared with those that underwent minimal postoperative intervention .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, there are a few of studies that question the benefits of early, aggressive debridement . These studies have shown no difference in outcomes in patients that underwent regular debridement compared with those that underwent minimal postoperative intervention . Nonetheless, debridement, practised by many, is regarded as the cornerstone of postoperative care and is evidence based .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A prospective randomised single‐blinded clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the nasal douching products Sterimar™ and Sinus Rinse™ following functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Salib

Talpallikar

Uppal

et al. 2013

Clinical Otolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prospective randomised single‐blinded clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the nasal douching products Sterimar™ and Sinus Rinse™ following functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Salib

Talpallikar

Uppal

et al. 2013

Clinical Otolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1327,1328 One study 1327 used a within-subject design with 1 side randomized to receive outpatient debridement at 2, 4, and 6 weeks, and the other side received no debridement. A surgeon blinded to which side was debrided assessed the endoscopic appearance at 3 months after surgery and assigned a modified endoscopic score.…”

Section: Xe2 Sinus Cavity Debridementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Orlandi

Kingdom

Hwang

et al. 2016

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

559

888

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The body of knowledge regarding rhinosinusitis (RS) continues to expand, with rapid growth in number of publications, yet substantial variability in the quality of those presentations. In an effort to both consolidate and critically appraise this information, rhinologic experts from around the world have produced the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR:RS). Methods:Evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs) were developed for scores of topics, using previously reported methodology. Where existing evidence was insufficient for an EBRR, an evidence-based review (EBR) was produced. The sections were then synthesized and the entire manuscript was then reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results:The resulting ICAR:RS document addresses multiple topics in RS, including acute RS (ARS), chronic RS (CRS) with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP), recurrent acute RS (RARS), acute exacerbation of CRS (AE-CRS), and pediatric RS. Conclusion:As a critical review of the RS literature, ICAR:RS provides a thorough review of pathophysiology and evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment. It also demonstrates the significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology and optimal management of RS. Too o en the foundation upon which these recommendations are based is comprised of lowerlevel evidence. It is our hope that this summary of the evidence in RS will point out where additional research efforts may be directed. C 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC. Key Words:rhinosinusitis; chronic rhinosinusitis; acute rhinosinusitis; recurrent acute rhinosinusitis; evidence-based medicine; systematic review; endoscopic sinus surgery List of Abbreviations Used

show abstract

“…On the contrary, the benefit of this treatment for prophylaxis of adhesions and synechiae is stressed by other sources [98], [279], [280], [281], [282]. Especially in differentiated and extended surgeries, e.g.…”

Section: “Minor” Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery

Hosemann

Draf

2013

GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; 12:Doc06; ISSN 1865-1011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing intense endoscopic cleaning versus minimal intervention in the early post-operative period following functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Cited by 12 publications

References 8 publications

A prospective randomised single‐blinded clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the nasal douching products Sterimar™ and Sinus Rinse™ following functional endoscopic sinus surgery

A prospective randomised single‐blinded clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the nasal douching products Sterimar™ and Sinus Rinse™ following functional endoscopic sinus surgery

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About