2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective randomized comparison of conventional instruments and the Harmonic Focus® device in breast-conserving therapy for primary breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In their prospective randomized trial, Böhm et al found no difference regarding the operative time, but less drainage volume in the breast and the axilla, less intramammary seroma and hematoma, less axillary seroma and less pain in the Harmonic surgery arm. These differences were all statistically significant and the risk of an axillary seroma was even lowered by 70% using the Harmonic scalpel [27]. In contrast to these findings, a recently published meta-analysis including 6 studies comparing electrocautery with ultrasonic dissection in mastectomy did not find any differences [28].…”
Section: Ultrasonic Dissection -The Harmonic Focuscontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their prospective randomized trial, Böhm et al found no difference regarding the operative time, but less drainage volume in the breast and the axilla, less intramammary seroma and hematoma, less axillary seroma and less pain in the Harmonic surgery arm. These differences were all statistically significant and the risk of an axillary seroma was even lowered by 70% using the Harmonic scalpel [27]. In contrast to these findings, a recently published meta-analysis including 6 studies comparing electrocautery with ultrasonic dissection in mastectomy did not find any differences [28].…”
Section: Ultrasonic Dissection -The Harmonic Focuscontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…The use in breast surgery was evaluated in different studies that focused on mastectomies or axillary dissection (summarized in [27], meta-analysis [28]), but a recently published study by Böhm et al [27] evaluated the use of ultrasonic dissection in BCS. The authors used the Harmonic Focus ® Curved Shears (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Norderstedt, Germany) ( fig.…”
Section: Ultrasonic Dissection -The Harmonic Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Articles investigating different instruments/surgical techniques [25,26,27], postsurgical physiotherapy [28], or breast infections without relation to the insertion of drains [29,30] were excluded. This left the 3 articles from Taylor et al [5], Andeweg et al [31], and Garbay et al [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the Harmonic instruments available, the CS-14-C® and the Ace® are the most frequently used for abdominal procedures. The Focus device was originally designed for head and neck surgery or breast surgery with axillary lymph node dissection [2,5]. However, in our opinion, the CS-14-C and Ace devices are cumbersome and are less ergonomic than the Focus shears, especially for the fine grasping and careful dissection required for resection in cancer of the pancreas head.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%