2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective randomized pilot study of Y90+/−sorafenib as bridge to transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
63
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Those reductions and interruptions might suggest that the optimal dose would preferably be lower for patients undergoing this type of combined treatment, because half the patient cohort did not seem to be able to tolerate a full dose of sorafenib. That hypothesis also accords with results of a study by Kulik et al 50 , which prospectively evaluated patients receiving 90 Y with and without sorafenib, and which also pointed toward a sorafenib dose reduction (400 mg daily), because dose reductions were required for all patients in the combined treatment arm. creating a vasculature normalization window 38 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Those reductions and interruptions might suggest that the optimal dose would preferably be lower for patients undergoing this type of combined treatment, because half the patient cohort did not seem to be able to tolerate a full dose of sorafenib. That hypothesis also accords with results of a study by Kulik et al 50 , which prospectively evaluated patients receiving 90 Y with and without sorafenib, and which also pointed toward a sorafenib dose reduction (400 mg daily), because dose reductions were required for all patients in the combined treatment arm. creating a vasculature normalization window 38 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…sorafenib) and in BCLC B (TACE/drug-eluting beads ? sorafenib), with the most encouraging results among a HCV alone cohort [16][17][18][19][20]. However, it is apparent that, with tumor progression, many patients develop hepatic decompensation, limiting the ability to initiate sorafenib [21,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of 20 patients with HCC (Child Pugh ≤B8, no vascular invasion) compared SIRT with Y-90 glass microspheres alone versus the combination of SIRT and sorafenib (treated with sorafenib 400 mg bid for 14 days before SIRT, with the intent to bridge to transplantation). The combination arm was associated with more peri-operative biliary complications than with SIRT alone (LoE III) (58). The ongoing SORAMIC study compares SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres followed 3 days later with oral sorafenib (200 mg bid for 1 week and then 400 mg bid) vs. sorafenib alone with a matching dosing schedule in patients with Child-Pugh ≤B7 BCLC A-C class HCC.…”
Section: Rationale and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%