2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

14
145
2
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
14
145
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of barriers separating the blood from the air and decreasing the surface of contact of artificial materials with the blood gives measurable benefits, such as reduction in the incidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), although SIRS itself occurs almost always, with a variable degree of severity [1,2]. 'Mini-CPB' significantly decreases the incidence of early inflammatory response, which was confirmed in a randomised trial by Kiaii et al [3] and in other studies [1,4]. In our study we found earlier rise of the CRP and procalcitonin levels as well as leukocyte count in the 'mini-CPB' group than in the control group by approximately 24 h, with a gradual decrease thereafter in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of barriers separating the blood from the air and decreasing the surface of contact of artificial materials with the blood gives measurable benefits, such as reduction in the incidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), although SIRS itself occurs almost always, with a variable degree of severity [1,2]. 'Mini-CPB' significantly decreases the incidence of early inflammatory response, which was confirmed in a randomised trial by Kiaii et al [3] and in other studies [1,4]. In our study we found earlier rise of the CRP and procalcitonin levels as well as leukocyte count in the 'mini-CPB' group than in the control group by approximately 24 h, with a gradual decrease thereafter in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In our study we found earlier rise of the CRP and procalcitonin levels as well as leukocyte count in the 'mini-CPB' group than in the control group by approximately 24 h, with a gradual decrease thereafter in both groups. Higher average levels of inflammatory markers in the 'mini-CPB' group This is related to higher HGB and HCT levels after the 'mini-CPB' procedure is conducted [4,5]. This significantly smaller decrease in HCT level is caused by minimal haemodilution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…18,19) The influence of surgical team set-up in our trial on higher bleeding in group C seems to be inconsequential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Table 1) is a comparison of these three larger randomized trials with at least 100 patients comparing M-CPB to C-CPB. Two of the studies [9,10] demonstrate a clear benefit with respect to bleeding and transfusion either in the OR, the first 24 hours, or in actual reoperations for bleeding. After isolated CABG with conventional CPB (C-CPB) it has been well demonstrated in large studies that perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is an important factor in postoperative mortality, infection, ischemic postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, and hospital costs [12].…”
Section: Common Features To M-cpbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there are only three with more than 100 patients randomized in each arm [9][10][11]. (Table 1) is a comparison of these three larger randomized trials with at least 100 patients comparing M-CPB to C-CPB.…”
Section: Common Features To M-cpbmentioning
confidence: 99%