2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Myeloablative Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation versus HLA-Haploidentical Related Stem Cell Transplantation for Adults with Hematologic Malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-year NRM and relapse in the two arms were 52% versus 23% and 17% versus 23%, respectively. Two-year DFS, OS, and GVHD/RFS in the two arms were 30% versus 54%, 35% versus 59%, and 17% versus 40%, respectively, indicating that in the context of an MAC regimen, Haplo-SCT with PTCy provides improved outcomes compared with ATG-containing single-unit UCBT 26 . A retrospective single-institutional study by Raiola et al 31 revealed that despite having more patients older than 50 (40% versus 23%) and with advanced disease (58% versus 41%), Haplo SCT using PTCy and bone marrow had superior 3-year NRM (18% versus 35%) and 4-year OS (52% versus 34%) than single-unit UCBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two-year NRM and relapse in the two arms were 52% versus 23% and 17% versus 23%, respectively. Two-year DFS, OS, and GVHD/RFS in the two arms were 30% versus 54%, 35% versus 59%, and 17% versus 40%, respectively, indicating that in the context of an MAC regimen, Haplo-SCT with PTCy provides improved outcomes compared with ATG-containing single-unit UCBT 26 . A retrospective single-institutional study by Raiola et al 31 revealed that despite having more patients older than 50 (40% versus 23%) and with advanced disease (58% versus 41%), Haplo SCT using PTCy and bone marrow had superior 3-year NRM (18% versus 35%) and 4-year OS (52% versus 34%) than single-unit UCBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A total of 37 articles underwent full-length review; 23 of them were excluded because they only evaluated patients receiving either Haplo-SCT, UCBT, or combined Haplo-SCT and UCBT, nonhematologic cancers, and lack of direct comparison results; 2 articles were excluded due to insufficient data. The final analysis included 12 studies including 2 prospective clinical studies 25,26 and 10 retrospective cohort studies [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] . This included 2,793 patients who underwent Haplo-SCT (1,432 patients) or UCBT (1,361 patients).…”
Section: General Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, two recent report from Europe on patients with acute leukemia who received a thiotepa-containing non-irradiation containing myeloablative regimen found higher survival after haplo compared to UCB HSCT. 30,31 We examined carefully for a transplant center on survival and found none. Thus, the available data support using haplo-or UCB as alternate donor sources to increase access to HSCT when an HLA-matched relative or unrelated adult donor is not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, two recent prospective, randomized trials indicated better outcomes with HLA-haploidentical grafts compared to UCB transplants. 111,112 However, relapse has remained a major complication, as half of the patients relapsed two years after transplant in both studies, regardless of conditioning regimen intensity. Additional controlled comparisons of the two donor sources may be needed to validate the superiority of HLA-haploidentical over UCB grafts.…”
Section: Current Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%