Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using radio-pharmaceutical (RP) and a blue dye is gold standard for axillary staging in clinically node-negative early breast cancer. High costs and limited availability of RP and/or gamma probe are major deterrents in performing SLNB in developing countries. Fluorescence-guided SLNB can obviate the need for RP and gamma probe. Fluorescein is an inexpensive fluorescent lymphatic tracer. In this study, we compared SLN identification rate (SLN-IR) and false negative rates (FNR) of fluorescein-guided SLNB and radio-guided SLNB using 99m Tc-Sulfur-colloid, in isolation, or in combination with methylene blue dye (MBD). Methods Sixty-five cN0 early and large operable breast cancer patients underwent validation SLNB using fluorescein (and blue LED light), 99m Tc-Sulfur-colloid (and gamma probe) and MBD. Inj Fluorescein 4% was injected, 1 ml each peri-tumoral and sub-areolar five minutes before axillary incision. Axillary dissection was performed irrespective of SLNB histology. The SLN-IR and FNR with various tracers and their combinations were compared.
ResultsThe mean number of SLNs identified was 3.5 ± 1.8 (range 1-6). The SLN-IR using RP alone was 94%, fluorescein alone was 92%, and MBD alone was 82%. The SLN-IR using fluorescein plus MBD combination was 95.4%, compared to 97% using MBD plus RP combination. FNR was 6.3% using fluorescein plus MBD, as well as RP plus MBD combinations. Conclusions SLN-IR of [ 90% and SLN-FNR of \ 10% using fluorescein plus MBD combination are in acceptable range, and are comparable to that of RP plus MBD combination. Fluorescein can replace RP for performing SLNB, in combination with MBD.Ramya C Valiveru and Gaurav Agarwal are joint first authors, having contributed equally.