2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective real-time evaluation of the QTc interval variation after low-dose droperidol among emergency department patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A modest mean QTc increase of 30 ms was observed, with only 4.4% of patients experiencing an increase of ≥60 ms. While the findings of this study are reassuring, only two of the 68 patients were under 18 years old; thus the results may not be generalizable to children 29 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A modest mean QTc increase of 30 ms was observed, with only 4.4% of patients experiencing an increase of ≥60 ms. While the findings of this study are reassuring, only two of the 68 patients were under 18 years old; thus the results may not be generalizable to children 29 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…While the findings of this study are reassuring, only two of the 68 patients were under 18 years old; thus the results may not be generalizable to children. 29 The most common adverse events described in the included articles after droperidol administration were hypotension (which typically did not require intervention) and dystonic reactions (which responded to anticholinergic medications). One case of respiratory depression occurred in a patient who also had alcohol intoxication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, multiple indirect studies demonstrated the absence of any significant adverse effects of droperidol on the QTc interval in doses typically used for the treatment of CHS. 40,137,141,142 Rural or smaller EDs, or those that are overcrowded, may experience difficulty in using either haloperidol or droperidol if there is a requirement for patients to be on cardiac monitors. However, GRACE-4 Writing Team consensus supported that current evidence dictates that cardiac monitoring is not required for administration of this medication at doses typically administered for CHS unless other risk factors are present.…”
Section: Haloperidol and Droperidolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both have been implicated with causing QTc prolongation, which has led to a black box warning for their use. Since then, multiple indirect studies demonstrated the absence of any significant adverse effects of droperidol on the QTc interval in doses typically used for the treatment of CHS 40,137,141,142 …”
Section: Pico Question 368mentioning
confidence: 99%