2006
DOI: 10.1097/00042728-200606000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Study of Wound Infections in Dermatologic Surgery in the Absence of Prophylactic Antibiotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11]13,15,16 Six of these studies include at least control arms where no antibiotic prophylaxis was used and the rates of SSIs remained low (0.72%-4.25%), providing strong evidence that antibiotics are not warranted for the majority of dermatologic surgery cases. [7][8][9][10]15,16 Yet, all of the studies to date used sterile technique at least during the wound reconstruction phase of the dermatologic surgeries. Our study is the first to identify the rate of SSI using clean surgical technique for all steps of MMS, including wound reconstruction, without antibiotic prophylaxis or topical antibiotics for postoperative wound care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11]13,15,16 Six of these studies include at least control arms where no antibiotic prophylaxis was used and the rates of SSIs remained low (0.72%-4.25%), providing strong evidence that antibiotics are not warranted for the majority of dermatologic surgery cases. [7][8][9][10]15,16 Yet, all of the studies to date used sterile technique at least during the wound reconstruction phase of the dermatologic surgeries. Our study is the first to identify the rate of SSI using clean surgical technique for all steps of MMS, including wound reconstruction, without antibiotic prophylaxis or topical antibiotics for postoperative wound care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 More recently, 3 studies have illustrated that this low rate of SSI is achievable without the use of prophylactic antibiotics, finding SSIs in 0.7%, 1.47%, and 1.8% of dermatologic surgeries. [8][9][10] When comparing these studies, each has its own surgical protocol to prevent infection. This variation can also be found when comparing the practices of Mohs surgeons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each biopsy specimen demonstrated histologic evidence of NSF, lending validity to our skin scoring system. We intentionally limited our analysis for NSF to a noninvasive skin examination so as to maximize the number of patients who would participate and to avoid the less than trivial infectious complications of a full-thickness (often lower extremity) skin biopsy (20,21), especially given that the patients in this study universally had renal failure and a high prevalence of skin fibrosis and diabetes mellitus, which are known risk factors for surgical wound infection and poor wound healing (22)(23)(24). By not requiring a skin biopsy, we were able to achieve a 94% participation rate and to minimize selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, 5091 lesions on 2424 patients were surgically removed over a span of 3 years. 19 None of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics, and rates of infection were determined. This study concluded that several scenarios resulted in an unacceptably high surgical site infection rate, over 5% (Table VI).…”
Section: Surgical Site Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%