2011
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.208595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective study on central venous line associated bloodstream infections

Abstract: CLABSI incidence varied by type of catheter and type of patient, with the highest risk in neonates (with silastic percutaneous CVC) and by far the lowest risk for Port-a-cath CVC. Prophylactic measures to reduce CLABSI should be tailored to individual types of catheters and patient characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing studies on CLABSI is challenging due to different study population and methodology used. Only another prospective study, conducted in a whole pediatric hospital, is available in literature [10]. This study included 152 patients for overall 14,752 catheter observation days, with a CLABSI rate of 0.95/1000 central line-days [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing studies on CLABSI is challenging due to different study population and methodology used. Only another prospective study, conducted in a whole pediatric hospital, is available in literature [10]. This study included 152 patients for overall 14,752 catheter observation days, with a CLABSI rate of 0.95/1000 central line-days [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Swiss study performed in a single institution between April 2008 and March 2009 on 152 patients showed an overall CLABSI incidence of 0.95/1000 central line-days. In this study, CLABSI incidence varied by type of catheter and by patient’s age, with the highest risk in neonates with Silastic® percutaneous central line [10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLABSI is one of the deadliest types of HAIs, with a mortality rate of 12%-25%. [11][12][13] Several factors, such as those related to the patients (immunodeficiency, need for extracorporeal life support or renal replacement therapy), CVC use (prolonged catheterization, type of CVC material, and anatomical site of insertion and handling), have been shown to increase the risk of CVC infection. 13 Here, we report an epidemiologic study about the CLABSIs in our PICU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) For long-term central venous access, cuffed and tunneled CVCs are associated with a higher risk for CLABSI than totally implanted devices (Porth-a-cath). (10,11,28). However, if the patient needs continuous access for many days or intermittent access day after day, a cuffed and tunneled CVC is preferable to a totally implanted device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%