2021
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1995039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective study on COVID-19 seroprevalence and behavioural patterns in military personnel from the Southern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 , 15 Few seroprevalence studies focused on public safety personnel. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Garbarino et al 20 reported an overall seroprevalence of 4.8% in 10,535 police officers in Italy, with a higher seroprevalence in northern (9%) than in southern regions (1.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14 , 15 Few seroprevalence studies focused on public safety personnel. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Garbarino et al 20 reported an overall seroprevalence of 4.8% in 10,535 police officers in Italy, with a higher seroprevalence in northern (9%) than in southern regions (1.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Few seroprevalence studies focused on public safety personnel. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Garbarino et al 20 reported an overall seroprevalence of 4.8% in 10,535 police officers in Italy, with a higher seroprevalence in northern (9%) than in southern regions (1.6%). In our cohort, the seroprevalence at the baseline was 12.9% in February 2021, similar to that reported in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indirect support of the latter option is provided by assessments of the beliefs and attitudes of military personnel towards the COVID-19 pandemic, which showed that the spectrum of attitudes was considerable and, by far, not all soldiers considered the diseaseassociated threat as serious [20,21]. It is likely that negative attitudes towards restrictive infection control measures might have been facilitated by the fact that soldiers were much less endangered than civilians by COVID-19 in terms of both the need for intensive care treatment and death [22], which is a typical "healthy worker effect".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%