Prospective study on prevalence, intensity, type, and therapy of acute pain in a second-level urban emergency department

Abstract

AimPain represents the most frequent cause for patient admission to emergency departments (EDs). Oligoanalgesia is a common problem in this field. The aims of this study were to assess prevalence and intensity of pain in patients who visited a second-level urban ED and to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological treatment administered subsequent to variations in pain intensity.MethodsA 4-week prospective observational study was carried out on 2,838 patients who visited a second-level urban ED. Pain intensity was evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale at the moment of triage. The efficacy of prescribed analgesic therapy was evaluated at 30 and 60 minutes, and at discharge. Data concerning pain intensity were classified as absent, slight, mild, or severe. Pain was evaluated in relation to the prescribed therapy.ResultsPain prevalence was 70.7%. Traumatic events were the primary cause in most cases (40.44%), followed by pain linked to urologic problems (13.52%), abdominal pain (13.39%), and nontraumatic musculoskeletal pain (7.10%). Only 32.46% of patients were given pharmacological therapy. Of these, 76% reported severe pain, 19% moderate, and 5% slight, and 66% received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or paracetamol, 4% opioids, and 30% other therapies. A difference of at least 2 points on the Numerical Rating Scale was observed in 84% of patients on reevaluation following initial analgesic therapy.ConclusionPain represents one of the primary reasons for visits to EDs. Although a notable reduction in pain intensity has been highlighted in patients who received painkillers, results show that inadequate treatment of pain in ED continues to be a problem.

Non-interventional study evaluating exposure to inhaled, low-dose methoxyflurane experienced by hospital emergency department personnel in France

“…Effective management of moderate-to-severe pain in emergency medicine is a crucial element of patient care. In Europe, approximately 38 million injured patients are treated each year in hospital emergency departments, and pain is the primary reason for most patients visiting the emergency department 1–3. Unfortunately, undertreatment of pain in emergency settings is common.…”

“…Unfortunately, undertreatment of pain in emergency settings is common. Indeed, large-scale studies of European hospital emergency departments indicate fewer than one third of patients with moderate-to-severe pain receive analgesia 3 4…”

The clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain: a protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)

“…Pain is a major healthcare issue. Estimates of the prevalence of acute pain in adults suggest that it may be as high as 70.7% in accident and emergency departments and 50% in hospital inpatients, with up to 35% of patients reporting severe pain 1. Estimates of the worldwide prevalence of chronic pain in the general adult population suggest it may affect up to 45% of people, with up to 15% reporting severe disabling pain 2–6.…”

Prospective, Multicentre Trial of Methoxyflurane for Acute Trauma-Related Pain in Helicopter Emergency Medical Systems and Hostile Environments: METEORA Protocol

“…In emergency rescue situations, effective analgesia reduces the patient’s physiological and psychological stress and aids extrication and procedural interventions such as realignment and splinting of fractures. However, the undertreatment of acute pain (“oligoanalgesia”) in the pre-hospital emergency setting remains a significant problem [ 2 , 3 ]. Albrecht and colleagues reported a prevalence of oligoanalgesia of 43% in a 10-year retrospective study of adult trauma patients transported by a physician-staffed air-medical transport system in Switzerland [ 4 ].…”

“…In Europe, commonly used analgesics for trauma pain include paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nitrous oxide, ketamine and opioids [ 3 , 6 – 8 ]. Besides analgesic efficacy, safety profile and ease of use will influence the treatment choice, particularly in emergency situations in remote and/or hostile environments where cannulation may be difficult or where bulky equipment cannot be carried.…”