2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66337-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Validation of the Association of Local Tumor Stage and Grade as a Predictive Factor for Occult Lymph Node Micrometastasis in Patients With Penile Carcinoma and Clinically Negative Inguinal Lymph Nodes

Abstract: The predictive value of the association of local tumor stage and grade for occult lymph node micrometastasis was validated in a prospective study. This factor allows the differentiation of 3 risk groups of patients with high reliability in the low and high risk groups. However, other prognostic factors are needed in the intermediate risk group to improve the prediction of lymph node involvement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
53
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2006). Risk groups systems combine histological grade with tumor extension to estimate the likelihood of inguinal nodal involvement (Solsona et al 2001, 2004; Hungerhuber et al 2006; Ornellas et al 2008). The combination of histological grade, anatomical level of invasion and presence of perineural invasion was found to be strongly related to nodal involvement and cancer-specific survival (Chaux et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2006). Risk groups systems combine histological grade with tumor extension to estimate the likelihood of inguinal nodal involvement (Solsona et al 2001, 2004; Hungerhuber et al 2006; Ornellas et al 2008). The combination of histological grade, anatomical level of invasion and presence of perineural invasion was found to be strongly related to nodal involvement and cancer-specific survival (Chaux et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,25 These factors can then further define patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups for lymph node metastasis. 18,60,61 The European Association of Urology determined risk stratification groups for patients with nonpalpable ILNs, and validated this in both univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors. Patients can be stratified according to stage and/or grade into risk groups based on the likelihood of harboring occult node-positive disease, with the low-risk group defined as patients with Tis, Ta,G1–2 or T1,G1; the intermediate-risk group as those with T1,G2; and the high-risk group as those with T2 or G3.…”
Section: Management Of Regional Lymph Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients can be stratified according to stage and/or grade into risk groups based on the likelihood of harboring occult node-positive disease, with the low-risk group defined as patients with Tis, Ta,G1–2 or T1,G1; the intermediate-risk group as those with T1,G2; and the high-risk group as those with T2 or G3. 51,60 …”
Section: Management Of Regional Lymph Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential prognostic markers are usually validated using prospective studies for clinical application [25]. Tissue or blood specimens are typically accumulated on a long-term basis until there are clear objectives for study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%