2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective validation of the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
27
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
27
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study was compared with Tarik et al [6] According to Tarik et al (p=0.0001), perioperative Gall Bladder status, mean surgery duration (p =0.0001) and mean length of hospital stay (p=0.0001) was found to be same as our study results (p=0.0001) both were statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study was compared with Tarik et al [6] According to Tarik et al (p=0.0001), perioperative Gall Bladder status, mean surgery duration (p =0.0001) and mean length of hospital stay (p=0.0001) was found to be same as our study results (p=0.0001) both were statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The factors leading to difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be predicted [12] . The accurate and reliable stratification of the severity of gallbladder disease require a grading system which can be easily employed and implemented which further helps in operability, intra & postoperative outcome of the patient [6] . Multiple grading scales have been developed to predict the difficult laparoscopic surgery in which most are based on pre operative clinical findings [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the PGS, gallbladder appearance on laparoscopy is rated on a severity scale of 1–5 based on multiple gross findings such as hyperemia, adhesion formation, distention, perforation, or necrosis. Prospective analyses have found that increased severity of grading is significantly associated with increased difficulty of surgery, conversion rates, length of the operation, and incidence of post-operative bile leak [ 14 ]. Notably, gallbladder size is not an included characteristic indicative of such complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To use one of these scales, it must be based on intraoperative findings and thus define the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which, regardless of the surgeon, will not change. Given the above, multiple scales such as Parkland, AAST, Cuschieri or Sugrue [8][9][10] have been described, another of these scales were described by Nassar et al, in 1995, which was recently validated in a study that included two prospective cohorts with a total of 12,909 patients. Intraoperative findings are standardized with the help of one of these scales [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%