2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00744.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects for Labour in Global Value Chains: Labour Standards in the Cut Flower and Banana Industries

Abstract: Global value chain (GVC) governance is central to analyses of labour's strategic options. It frames the terrain on which labour campaigns and institutions -such as Private Social Standards and International Framework Agreements -contribute to the social regulation of value chains.GVC concepts help to emphasise how power in the employment relationship transcends organisational boundaries, as well as how industrial power is shifting from the sphere of production to that of consumption. Based on extensive case st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
148
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
148
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The HRM literature tended in the past to neglect what happens within and across supply chains (Fisher, Graham, Vachon, & Vereecke, 2010), although this has been partially remedied in recent years by a wide range of literature examining global supply chains, labour standards and regulation (see, for example, Riisegaard & Hammer, 2011;Reinecke, Manning, & von Hagen, 2012). Nevertheless, gaps remain in the area of KT of HR practices across supply chains, especially within areas where core firms and key suppliers have traditionally operated in close spatial proximity, which this paper helps to address.…”
Section: Strategic Partnerships Kt and Hr Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HRM literature tended in the past to neglect what happens within and across supply chains (Fisher, Graham, Vachon, & Vereecke, 2010), although this has been partially remedied in recent years by a wide range of literature examining global supply chains, labour standards and regulation (see, for example, Riisegaard & Hammer, 2011;Reinecke, Manning, & von Hagen, 2012). Nevertheless, gaps remain in the area of KT of HR practices across supply chains, especially within areas where core firms and key suppliers have traditionally operated in close spatial proximity, which this paper helps to address.…”
Section: Strategic Partnerships Kt and Hr Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former, the focus has been mainly on how to optimize processes for sourcing products from domestic or overseas suppliers and pay the lowest possible price for the best possible product, delivered in the shortest possible time frame. Labor research in global value chains instead has addressed how workers (a) benefit from participation in global value chains, (b) are affected by corporations' ethical guidelines and economic upgrading or downgrading processes by local supplier firms, and (c) actively exert their agency to influence their work conditions (Barrientos et al, 2011;Nadvi, 2004;Riisgaard, 2009;Riisgaard and Hammer, 2011). Investigations of the effects of the new cooperative paradigm on CSR in global value chains thus could help build a bridge between operations and supply chain management studies and research into labor standards in global value chains by theorizing and empirically investigating how corporate purchasing practices affect labor standard compliance levels, whether positively or negatively, in developing country export industries.…”
Section: Purchasing Practices and Labor Standard Noncompliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, studies have investigated Fairtrade adoption and impact in contexts of permanent employees on plantations, for example, in tea, (Dolan, 2008(Dolan, , 2010Makita, 2012), and cut flowers and bananas (Riisgaard and Gibbon, 2014;Riisgaard and Hammer, 2014;Raynolds, 2012). In contrast, hired labourers who are employed by smallholder farmers or on outgrower schemes or informal workers in estates/plantations have been relatively invisible in certified agricultural value chain studies and debates.…”
Section: Teamentioning
confidence: 99%