2003
DOI: 10.1080/10643380390814532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects for Pathogen Reductions in Livestock Wastewaters: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicted E. coli concentrations in pasture tailwater above and below the wetland as (A) tailwater runoff rate increases (time since first runoff 3 hours, days since grazing 7 days); (B) days rested from cattle grazing prior to irrigation increases (time since first runoff 3 hours, tailwater runoff rate 1 cfs); (C) time since tailwater runoff begins during an irrigation event (days since grazing 7 days, tailwater runoff rate 1 cfs). s livestock wastewater (Gerba et al 1999;Hill 2003;Quinonez-Diaz et al 2001).…”
Section: Effects On E Coli Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicted E. coli concentrations in pasture tailwater above and below the wetland as (A) tailwater runoff rate increases (time since first runoff 3 hours, days since grazing 7 days); (B) days rested from cattle grazing prior to irrigation increases (time since first runoff 3 hours, tailwater runoff rate 1 cfs); (C) time since tailwater runoff begins during an irrigation event (days since grazing 7 days, tailwater runoff rate 1 cfs). s livestock wastewater (Gerba et al 1999;Hill 2003;Quinonez-Diaz et al 2001).…”
Section: Effects On E Coli Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VFS enhances infiltration process through soil matrix ecosystem functions including: First, accumulated organic matter residues that enhance permeability of soil surfaces, plants roots that increase soil hydraulic conductivity, interception of dissipated raindrops that reduces surface sealing, resistance to runoff flow that decreases flow velocity, and increased number of soil macropores resulting from macroinvertebrates ecosystem balancing actions (Cardoso et al 2012;Houdeshel et al 2015); secondly, the efficiency of VFS in retaining cowpat manure bacteria (e.g., E. coli) varies depending on hydrologic soil surface condition (Cardoso et al 2012); thirdly, there is a fast decline of fecal coliforms in cow part manures in the soilrunoff mixing zone that has a persistence of only 6-10 days after application date (Gessel et al 2004); fourth, the decay process occurs because of the inability of the E. coli to reduce its metabolic rate to meet the low availability of usable dissolved organic carbon (Klein and Casida 1967); fifth, in the weakened state of nutrient shortage, E. coli is also stressed by other environmental factors, including high soil temperatures of up to 35°C, strong solar radiation (550 cd in this study) and the acidic soil (pH 4.56) in the present study (Hill 2003); sixth, E. coli die-off rate in clay loam in dry, moist and wet conditions increases as temperature also increases from 25 to 35°C (Ling et al 2002b(Ling et al , 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Conservation of Escherichia coli mass balance in overland flow is controlled by fecal coliforms population dynamics, attenuation and diffusion (Tian et al 2002). Soil and surface water fecal contamination is a matter of public health concern because zoonotic diseases emanating from bacterial, viral, protozoan and helminthic pathogens can be interchanged between livestock and humans (Pell 1997;Hill 2003). The need to understand manure borne microbial pathogens such as E. coli is important because they cause infections to humans either through zoonotic or pollution processes in livestock-based systems, therefore, this problem deserves new studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What biological or energetic treatment methods, such as wetlands and ultraviolet radiation, are most practical and cost effi cient for co-management (Berry et al, 2007;Hill, 2003;Karim et al, 2004)? What technologies are currently in use (Mena, 2006)?…”
Section: Specify Proven Practices That Preserve Food Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%