2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61614-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects for population screening and diagnosis of lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
95
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
95
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[28]. Es wird angenommen, dass die Performanz der derzeit auf anamnestisch identifizierbaren Faktoren basierenden Risikomodelle nicht wesentlich gesteigert werden kann [8]. Möglicherweise kann aber durch den Einschluss genetischer oder molekularer Biomarker eine Verbesserung der Risikomodelle erreicht werden.…”
Section: Bach/spitzunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[28]. Es wird angenommen, dass die Performanz der derzeit auf anamnestisch identifizierbaren Faktoren basierenden Risikomodelle nicht wesentlich gesteigert werden kann [8]. Möglicherweise kann aber durch den Einschluss genetischer oder molekularer Biomarker eine Verbesserung der Risikomodelle erreicht werden.…”
Section: Bach/spitzunclassified
“…Experimentelle Ansätze konnten zeigen, dass Genanalysen des Nasalepithels von Rauchern als Surrogatparameter dienen könnten, um den schadhaften Effekt des Rauchens auf die Lunge zu beurteilen [30]. Die Entwicklung von Biomarkern und Risikogenen tritt somit zunehmend in den Fokus der Forschung, und die laufenden Screeningstudien könnten beitragen, hier in den kommenden Jahre weitere Fortschritte zu erzielen [8,9]. …”
Section: Bach/spitzunclassified
“…It's of note that the probability was not significantly different between the NELSON participants with nodules <100 mm 3 compared to those with no CT detected nodules in the trial (0.6% vs. 0.4%). However, individuals with 100-300 mm 3 nodal volume had a higher probability of developing lung cancer (2.4%) and were considered indeterminate with intermediate risk; whilst the participants with nodules greater than 300 mm 3 had a significantly greater risk compared to no nodules (16.9%) and thus had a very high probability of developing lung cancer (21). A very important message was provided on examining the NELSON volume doubling time data; the 2-year probability of developing lung cancer in patients with nodules measuring 50-100 mm 3 (or 4-5 mm diameter) was extremely low and did not significantly differ from patients with no CT scan detected nodules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, individuals with 100-300 mm 3 nodal volume had a higher probability of developing lung cancer (2.4%) and were considered indeterminate with intermediate risk; whilst the participants with nodules greater than 300 mm 3 had a significantly greater risk compared to no nodules (16.9%) and thus had a very high probability of developing lung cancer (21). A very important message was provided on examining the NELSON volume doubling time data; the 2-year probability of developing lung cancer in patients with nodules measuring 50-100 mm 3 (or 4-5 mm diameter) was extremely low and did not significantly differ from patients with no CT scan detected nodules. This observation questions whether these individuals require yearly CT scans in a long term screening program and takes into account the harm and benefits for regular screening in such individuals; i.e., radiation exposure, psychological distress and cost effectiveness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation