1972
DOI: 10.1016/0090-6980(72)90063-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostaglandin E2: Effects on aggregation, shape change and cyclic AMP of rat platelets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous experiments have demonstrated that PGE 2 is able to either promote or inhibit platelet aggregation in experiments performed in vitro depending on the precise experimental conditions used [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and when we started the current experiments it was believed that overall promotion or inhibition of platelet aggregation by PGE 2 is the consequence of effects of PGE 2 at EP3 receptors (causing potentiation via G i and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase) and IP receptors (causing inhibition via G s and stimulation of adenylyl cyclase). It was within this context that we looked at the effects of the IP antagonist CAY10441 to explore the role of the IP receptor, the EP3 antagonist DG-041 to explore the role of the EP3 receptor, and the EP4 antagonist ONO-AE3-208 to explore the role of the EP4 receptor in determining the effects of PGE 2 on platelet function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous experiments have demonstrated that PGE 2 is able to either promote or inhibit platelet aggregation in experiments performed in vitro depending on the precise experimental conditions used [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and when we started the current experiments it was believed that overall promotion or inhibition of platelet aggregation by PGE 2 is the consequence of effects of PGE 2 at EP3 receptors (causing potentiation via G i and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase) and IP receptors (causing inhibition via G s and stimulation of adenylyl cyclase). It was within this context that we looked at the effects of the IP antagonist CAY10441 to explore the role of the IP receptor, the EP3 antagonist DG-041 to explore the role of the EP3 receptor, and the EP4 antagonist ONO-AE3-208 to explore the role of the EP4 receptor in determining the effects of PGE 2 on platelet function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of numerous previous investigations performed on human, mouse and rat platelets suggest that the effects of prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) represent a balance between enhancement and inhibition of platelet function via interaction with different receptors for PGE 2 on the platelet surface [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. There is good evidence that potentiation of platelet function is via effects at EP3 receptors linked to G i and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase [7,10,11,[13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PGE 2 has long been known to attenuate platelet aggregation at high concentrations, ie, in the micromolar range; at lower concentrations, however, PGE 2 is promoting aggregatory responses induced by platelet activators, such as ADP or collagen. 6,7,9,10,32 Therefore, the primary action of PGE 2 was suggested to be proaggregatory. The EP3 receptor was subsequently characterized as the receptor that mediates the PGE 2 -induced augmentation of platelet aggregation, and EP3 receptor antagonists are currently under consideration as potential novel antithrombotic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17, 18] Studies in the early 1970s noted that the effect of PGE 2 on platelets was either inhibitory or stimulatory depending on its concentration and the species of animal examined. [19-22] Bruno et al reported that low doses of PGE 2 did not potentiate aggregation induced by either ADP or collagen, but higher (supraphysiological) doses (>1 μM) inhibited aggregation. [19] Others have observed potentiation of ADP- or collagen-induced aggregation at low doses (10-100 nM PGE 2 ) and inhibition at high doses (10 μM PGE 2 ), similar to the data from mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%