2017
DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.01.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate cancer and hypofractionation: reflections on recent randomised phase III clinical trial results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in late toxicity rates for MHRT was observed in RTOG 0415. This may be expected as Dearnaley points out that EQD2 was higher for the patients receiving MHRT [37] (see Table 5). No difference in late toxicities was observed in CHHiP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An increase in late toxicity rates for MHRT was observed in RTOG 0415. This may be expected as Dearnaley points out that EQD2 was higher for the patients receiving MHRT [37] (see Table 5). No difference in late toxicities was observed in CHHiP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…An increase in acute GI toxicity was observed with MHRT compared with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy in the CHHiP and PROFIT studies. Only 30% of the patients in CHHiP received image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), which may explain the relative larger toxicity observed here compared with PROFIT where treatment was delivered with daily image guidance [37]. Image-guided radiation therapy may improve toxicity rates [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, in the aim of shortening radiotherapy courses while maintaining excellent treatment outcomes, several randomized phase III trials have evaluated the efficacy of moderately hypofractionated and ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy in various scenarios of localized PCa treatment [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Despite receiving the combination, patients can experience a biochemical recurrence (ie, prostate-specific antigen increase), as well as distant metastases and prostate cancer-specific mortality; therefore, there is a need for treatment improvement. 4,5 Without such improvement, the administration of doseescalated RT and long-term ADT will have failed for 45% of patients with high-risk prostate cancer by 6 years. 6 To address the need for treatment intensification, we considered combining RT and ADT with the colonystimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitor pexidartinib.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%