2021
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate cancer and the social construct of race

Abstract: In prostate cancer, as in most diseases, race correlates with health outcomes. The influence of race is primarily through socioeconomic influences rather than inherent biological influences. There may be some inherent biological risk of disease associated with area of geographic origin, but that is distinct from race.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although racial classification is a social construct based on phenotype, it remains useful for describing health patterns in the United States because of its association with the social determinants of health resulting from systemic racism as well as genetic ancestry. 2,3 Collectively, African American/Black people have higher mortality than any other broadly defined racial/ethnic group 4 for most cancers and other leading causes of death, including heart disease, stroke, and diabetes (Table 1). These disparities are driven by lower socioeconomic status (SES), [5][6][7] which is associated with a higher prevalence of risk factors for cancer and other diseases, as well as less access to high-quality health care, largely because of inadequate health insurance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although racial classification is a social construct based on phenotype, it remains useful for describing health patterns in the United States because of its association with the social determinants of health resulting from systemic racism as well as genetic ancestry. 2,3 Collectively, African American/Black people have higher mortality than any other broadly defined racial/ethnic group 4 for most cancers and other leading causes of death, including heart disease, stroke, and diabetes (Table 1). These disparities are driven by lower socioeconomic status (SES), [5][6][7] which is associated with a higher prevalence of risk factors for cancer and other diseases, as well as less access to high-quality health care, largely because of inadequate health insurance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group includes African Americans, whose ancestors were brought to the United States involuntarily as slaves; Caribbean Americans; and recent immigrants of African descent. Although racial classification is a social construct based on phenotype, it remains useful for describing health patterns in the United States because of its association with the social determinants of health resulting from systemic racism as well as genetic ancestry 2,3 . Collectively, African American/Black people have higher mortality than any other broadly defined racial/ethnic group 4 for most cancers and other leading causes of death, including heart disease, stroke, and diabetes (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it must be emphasized that TCGA clinical data do not capture many important environmental, demographic, and behavioral factors that may also contribute to CSD, such as socioeconomic status, access to health care, diet and exercise habits, and stress associated with racial discrimination (44)(45). Some studies have shown that equity in or adjustment for these non-genetic factors significantly reduce the levels of CSD (46). Therefore, there may be hidden factors that confound the level of genetic contributions of identified DEGs to CSD that are unaccounted for in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Over the last few decades, researchers from the medical sciences to the social sciences have recognised how health and bodily concerns such as asthma, cancer, disability, alcoholism, obesity, mental illness, and survival are products of social construct (Poikolainen, 1982;Busfield, 1988;Bauman, 1992;Rich et al, 2000;Liachowitz, 2010;Nolan, 2017;Brawley, 2021). Vaccination is no exception, it is also a socially constructed, acquired, and reinforced phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%