2020
DOI: 10.1177/1073274820915720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate Cancer in Latin America: Challenges and Recommendations

Abstract: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent tumor among Latin American (LATAM) men. The incidence of de novo metastatic PCa is higher in LATAM than other parts of the world, and demographic changes in the region have increased disease burden. However, region-specific information regarding prevalence, progression, and treatment effectiveness is not currently available for nonmetastatic, castration-resistant PCa (nmCRPC). Nonmetastatic, castration-resistant PCa is a heterogeneous disease with varying potential to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, at the national level, PC was the top ranked cause of death among 27 groups of cancers in males, while at the global level, this neoplasm was ranked 4 th . Consequently, our results not only revealed that PC caused a higher burden of disease in males from Mexico when compared to the global reference but also confirmed that in some countries from Latin America, PC is among the main causes of death due to malign neoplasms [15]. It is worth mentioning that even though PC is linked to a high mortality in males from Mexico, the national mortality counts and death rate for this neoplasm are among the lowest in comparison to Argentina, Chile, Cuba, Brazil, Uruguay, and Venezuela, which are some of the countries with the highest mortality rates from the Americas [28,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, at the national level, PC was the top ranked cause of death among 27 groups of cancers in males, while at the global level, this neoplasm was ranked 4 th . Consequently, our results not only revealed that PC caused a higher burden of disease in males from Mexico when compared to the global reference but also confirmed that in some countries from Latin America, PC is among the main causes of death due to malign neoplasms [15]. It is worth mentioning that even though PC is linked to a high mortality in males from Mexico, the national mortality counts and death rate for this neoplasm are among the lowest in comparison to Argentina, Chile, Cuba, Brazil, Uruguay, and Venezuela, which are some of the countries with the highest mortality rates from the Americas [28,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Previous reports have demonstrated international heterogeneity in the burden of PC across nations [13,14], including countries from Latin America [15]. In the Americas, this geographical and temporal variation might be a reflection of national differences in diagnostic and treatment practices, access to healthcare, registration, and awareness [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We identified roughly 20 deaths per 100,000 men in Peru, similar to other LA countries such as Cuba and Venezuela, but higher compared to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Colombia, which are below 15 per 100,000 men (Carioli and Bertuccio, 2020;Reis et al, 2020). This demonstrates heterogeneity in prostate cancer mortality rates in LA countries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Increased public awareness and the ease of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing have led to PC being considered a public health priority in low-and middle-income settings [4]. In Latin America, the burden of PC follows the global trend [5], although with the existence of heterogeneity among the countries from this region [6]. This heterogeneity exposes the necessity for a further detailed characterization of the PC burden by country, as this information will provide a better overview of the patterns and trends of this disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%