2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2007.00297.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Orofacial Donor Site Fistula Following Surgical Reconstruction: A Clinical Report

Abstract: Orofacial defects can be either congenital or acquired. Rehabilitation of these patients can be done using a surgical and/or a prosthetic approach. In situations where surgical reconstruction is not possible, prosthetic management becomes the only option. This clinical report describes a simple, economical, and effective technique for the prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with oro-cutaneous fistula due to donor site dehiscence following tumor defect reconstruction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the decision was made to monitor and not address the extraoral component of the patient's defect at this time, prosthetic rehabilitation of orofacial fistulas have been described in the literature and shown to be successful in sealing the oral cavity from the extraoral environment. Kumar et al (2008) described the treatment for an orofacial fistula with an acrylic facial plug prosthesis relined with soft liner to provide an adequate seal during function and secured with circumferential head straps. 19 In our case, once the extraoral soft tissue architecture is more stable in the future, the decision to fabricate a facial prosthetic component will be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the decision was made to monitor and not address the extraoral component of the patient's defect at this time, prosthetic rehabilitation of orofacial fistulas have been described in the literature and shown to be successful in sealing the oral cavity from the extraoral environment. Kumar et al (2008) described the treatment for an orofacial fistula with an acrylic facial plug prosthesis relined with soft liner to provide an adequate seal during function and secured with circumferential head straps. 19 In our case, once the extraoral soft tissue architecture is more stable in the future, the decision to fabricate a facial prosthetic component will be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al (2008) described the treatment for an orofacial fistula with an acrylic facial plug prosthesis relined with soft liner to provide an adequate seal during function and secured with circumferential head straps. 19 In our case, once the extraoral soft tissue architecture is more stable in the future, the decision to fabricate a facial prosthetic component will be considered. The patient has been monitored for 5 months since the delivery of the prosthesis without any need for adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, surgical reconstruction may be limited by general medical condition, insufficient residual tissue, vascular compromise subsequent to radiation, age, inadequacy of the donor sites, or patient preference. It is not always possible to reconstruct the defect with a surgical approach (11). In these cases, prosthetic rehabilitation become the first choice treatment (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%