2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-008-0414-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosthetic repair of acutely incarcerated groin hernias: a prospective clinical observational cohort study

Abstract: Our results suggest that duration of symptoms longer than 6 h was an important factor for determining the need for resection. The use of non-absorbable mesh for acutely incarcerated groin hernia repair is effective and may be used with an acceptable incidence of wound infection and recurrence even when intestinal necrosis was present.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent studies have reported that strangulation is no longer a contraindication for tension-free mesh repair (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Wound Infection-recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have reported that strangulation is no longer a contraindication for tension-free mesh repair (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Wound Infection-recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atila et al, found an incidence rate of 11% in their prospective clinical study consisting of prosthetic repair of acutely incarcerated groin hernias. [7] Similarly, Birolini C, found a 15% incidence of wound related complications in their clinical study. [8] Legnani GL, found a low incidence of complications in their initial evaluation of 9 cases of strangulated inguinal hernias repaired laparoscopically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A recent meta-analysis on the risk factors for meshrelated infections after hernia repair surgery estimated the crude mesh infection rate to be 5 % [26]. The reported incidence of mesh infection in 16 studies reporting on the use of prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of the acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated ventral and groin hernias is 0.2 % despite the fact that resectionanastomosis of non-viable bowel was performed in 14.7 % of the patients (Table 5) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In the present study, none of the 18 patients who had resection-anastomosis of nonviable small intestine developed mesh infection, and this complication was encountered in one patient (1.25 %) whose hernia contained viable contents.…”
Section: -72mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such policy leaves patients with complicated hernias, that is, acute incarceration and/or strangulation at an unacceptably high risk of recurrence. Although several studies have clearly demonstrated the safety and efficacy of prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of the acutely incarcerated and/or strangulated inguinal and ventral hernias, however, surgeons remained both skeptical and reluctant to use prosthetics in such settings [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%