1978
DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90062-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protamine messenger RNA: Evidence for early synthesis and accumulation during spermatogenesis in rainbow trout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4B). In trout, synthesis of the protamine mRNA is known to occur during the primary spermatocyte stage (22). The testis-specific 3-kb SOX-LZ mRNA increased in quantity as the protamine mRNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4B). In trout, synthesis of the protamine mRNA is known to occur during the primary spermatocyte stage (22). The testis-specific 3-kb SOX-LZ mRNA increased in quantity as the protamine mRNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation in total RNA yield was probably due to extreme increases in certain transcripts related to development of germ cells (also see Liu et al 2000, Kusakabe et al 2002a. For example, protamine is a nuclear protein that is synthesized only in the spermatid cells of the testis and substitutes for histones in sperm chromatin during the haploid phase of spermatogenesis (Gilmour & Dixon 1972, Iatrou & Dixon 1978. Protamine transcripts increased 300-400 times in rainbow Figure 6 Changes in mRNA levels of FSH-R, LH-R, StAR, P450scc, P450C17, P45011 , 3 -HSD, 11 -HSD and 20 -HSD during spermatogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The low extent of annealing observed at high Cot values (<103) probably represents the reaction of some genes that were transcribed early in spermatogenesis to produce a stable mRNA [i.e., protamine genes (13)] and that were then inactivated by condensation into nucleoprotamine. The DNA-driven cross-reassociation reactions (Figs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%