2018
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protease‐deficient SOS constitutive cells have RecN‐dependent cell division phenotypes

Abstract: In Escherichia coli, after DNA damage, the SOS response increases the transcription (and protein levels) of approximately 50 genes. As DNA repair ensues, the level of transcription returns to homeostatic levels. ClpXP and other proteases return the high levels of several SOS proteins to homeostasis. When all SOS genes are constitutively expressed and many SOS proteins are stabilized by the removal of ClpXP, microscopic analysis shows that cells filament, produce mini-cells and have branching protrusions along … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it is interesting to note that E. coli RecN is rapidly degraded by the ClpXP protease in a manner dependent upon the signaling residues at the C terminus of RecN, which are not conserved among other RecN orthologs 48,49 . Efficient removal of topologically associated RecN and DNA may be essential for the growth recovery process, as these structures could interfere with chromosome segregation and lead to genetic instability 50 . Hence, we speculate that a ClpXP-dependent mechanism may play a role in removing some amount of RecN remaining on the DNA during growth recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it is interesting to note that E. coli RecN is rapidly degraded by the ClpXP protease in a manner dependent upon the signaling residues at the C terminus of RecN, which are not conserved among other RecN orthologs 48,49 . Efficient removal of topologically associated RecN and DNA may be essential for the growth recovery process, as these structures could interfere with chromosome segregation and lead to genetic instability 50 . Hence, we speculate that a ClpXP-dependent mechanism may play a role in removing some amount of RecN remaining on the DNA during growth recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the induction of the SOS response in cells due to external stress processes also triggered the expression of RecN proteins to coordinate double-strand break repair. During homologous recombination of double-strand breaks, RecN might interact with RecA to facilitate homology search and strand invasion [40] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overproduce SSB, we introduced a strong constitutive promoter and an improved ribosome binding site (RBS) upstream of the ssb gene as previously described for radA and recN (45,46). Briefly, the strong promoter and optimized RBS were linked to a flippable chloramphenicol resistance gene and inserted just upstream of the ssb gene (see Materials and Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%