2012
DOI: 10.5414/cn107156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib: an effective therapy for severe antibody mediated rejection after renal transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 AMR is now recognized as a major cause for graft loss after solid organ transplant. 3 As preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA), de novo DSA contribute to poor outcomes by increasing the risk of allograft rejections, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and death.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 AMR is now recognized as a major cause for graft loss after solid organ transplant. 3 As preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA), de novo DSA contribute to poor outcomes by increasing the risk of allograft rejections, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and death.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The first step is plasmapheresis, which helps not only in removing previously secreted antibodies but also, in increasing the metabolic demands on memory B cells and plasma cells and thereby, enhancing their susceptibility to proteasome inhibition. 5,6 The usual prescription includes 1.0 to 1.5 volume exchange using albumin solution daily or on alternate days, continued until serum creatinine falls within 30% of previous baseline values. This modality does not suppress antibody production and in fact, can cause a rebound in DSA levels after plasmapheresis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, it is only approved for use in multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma; however, success in reduction of DSAs and treatment of ABMR for solid organ transplant has been demonstrated in large studies [78,79]. Adult kidney transplant rejection studies have shown variable results for success when measured in terms of decreased DSAs, histological improvement, and/or improvement in graft function [80][81][82][83][84][85]. However, the cases that showed no response in graft function had improvements in DSA levels, but TPE was also used and follow-up was short, which may not have allowed enough time for reconstitution of DSAs.…”
Section: Cell Depletionmentioning
confidence: 99%