2017
DOI: 10.5802/aif.3115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

\protect \mathcal{L}-invariants, partially de Rham families, and local-global compatibility

Abstract: Let F℘ be a finite extension of Qp. By considering partially de Rham families, we establish a Colmez-Greenberg-Stevens formula (on Fontaine-Mazur L-invariants) for (general) 2-dimensional semi-stable non-crystalline Gal(Qp/F℘)-representations. As an application, we prove local-global compatibility results for completed cohomology of quaternion Shimura curves, and in particular the equality of Fontaine-Mazur L-invariants and Breuil's L-invariants, in critical case. Contents 4. Local-global compatibility 17 4.1.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cit. also show the existence of a similar spectral sequence in the case without fixing the central character, which can be used to prove (19)):…”
Section: Extensions Of Locally Analytic Representations Imentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…cit. also show the existence of a similar spectral sequence in the case without fixing the central character, which can be used to prove (19)):…”
Section: Extensions Of Locally Analytic Representations Imentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Let R L := B † rig,L , and R E := R L ⊗ Qp E. The cup-product induces a perfect pairing (e.g. see [19,Lem. 1.13]…”
Section: Fontaine-mazur Simple L-invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is automatically satisfied when F ℘ = Q p by the weak admissibility of (D 0 , D). Note also that in critical case, one can still define Fontaine-Mazur L-invariants L σ for the embeddings σ with a σ = 0; we refer to [21] for results in this case (where a key ingredient is the Colmez-GreenbergStevens formula in critical case).…”
Section: This Is a Smooth Admissible Representation Of G(a ∞ ) Equippmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keep the above notation.(1) The rigid space X p (ρ, λ Σ L \J ) is smooth at the point x c J .(2) The following statements are equivalent:(a) σ ∈ Σ \ J; (b) the natural projection of complete noetherian local E-algebrasThe smoothness of X p (ρ, λ Σ L \J ) follows from the same arguments of [14] (see also [4]). A key point is obtaining (a bound for) the dimension of the tangent space of X p (ρ, λ Σ L \J ) at x c J via Galois cohomology calculation (in our case, it would in particular involve some partially de Rham Galois cohomology considered in [22]). For (2) (from which Theorem 1.2 follows), the direction (c) ⇒ (a) follows easily from global triangulation theory; (b) ⇒ (c) follows from some locally analytic representation theory (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smoothness of X p (ρ, λ Σ L \J ) follows from the same arguments of [14] (see also [4]). A key point is obtaining (a bound for) the dimension of the tangent space of X p (ρ, λ Σ L \J ) at x c J via Galois cohomology calculation (in our case, it would in particular involve some partially de Rham Galois cohomology considered in [22]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%