2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protected Areas under Weak Institutions: Evidence from Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, our results show that ITs, OAs, and Community Managed PAs tend to secure larger carbon stocks than their surroundings, and this difference tends to increase towards the least accessible areas. Similar results were found in ITs with granted property rights in Brazil(27) and titled IT's in Colombia(26) which gradually decrease deforestation inside their boundaries. These gradual reductions in deforestation and degradation imply that indigenous and community land use, presumably for local livelihoods, reduce carbon stocks in the most accessible forests while conserving core areas.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, our results show that ITs, OAs, and Community Managed PAs tend to secure larger carbon stocks than their surroundings, and this difference tends to increase towards the least accessible areas. Similar results were found in ITs with granted property rights in Brazil(27) and titled IT's in Colombia(26) which gradually decrease deforestation inside their boundaries. These gradual reductions in deforestation and degradation imply that indigenous and community land use, presumably for local livelihoods, reduce carbon stocks in the most accessible forests while conserving core areas.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…For example, PAs from Colombia seem only to avoid carbon stock losses more than 5 km inside their boundaries in 2003 and 2016. These spatial patterns are not due to recent anthropogenic pressures and confirm the inability of PAs' to reduce forest loss inside their boundaries(26,42,43). Conversely, our results show that ITs, OAs, and Community Managed PAs tend to secure larger carbon stocks than their surroundings, and this difference tends to increase towards the least accessible areas.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5a; see Fig. S2 for a detailed map of the region) (https://bit.ly/2UFptjy; Betts et al 2017;Armenteras et al 2019;Bonilla-Mejía and Higuera-Mendieta 2019). These sites should be priority areas for conservation for the following reasons: (a) both sites are home to cacao CWR (Table S1); (b) this region has the largest continuous well-preserved forest in the Caquetá Department and connects the recently expanded Chiribiquete National Park with the Caquetá-Putumayo regions; and (c) this region has unique climatic conditions ( Fig.…”
Section: Conservation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These departments recognized collective land rights for Afro-Colombian (52,225 km 2 ), and indigenous groups (17,973 km 2 ) through a land reform that took place in the 1990s. According to the law, these collective lands are imprescriptible, inalienable and indefensible [24].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%