2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting child health by preventing school-related foodborne illnesses: Microbiological risk assessment of hygiene practices, drinking water and ready-to-eat foods in Italian kindergartens and schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The microbiological quality of the meals was also adequate, with MA and TC compliance rates of >94% and >88%, respectively. These results are consistent with those obtained by other authors in fully cooked food and raw vegetables (Legnani and others ; Marzano and Balzaretti ; Osimani and others ). However, it must be pointed out that most of the reports are based on National Legislations, showing different maximum limits for indicator microorganisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The microbiological quality of the meals was also adequate, with MA and TC compliance rates of >94% and >88%, respectively. These results are consistent with those obtained by other authors in fully cooked food and raw vegetables (Legnani and others ; Marzano and Balzaretti ; Osimani and others ). However, it must be pointed out that most of the reports are based on National Legislations, showing different maximum limits for indicator microorganisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to our established criteria, 86.7% and 96.7% of food‐contact surfaces were conforming to the MA and Enterobacteriaceae criteria, respectively, showing good cleaning and disinfection standards. Despite the more stringent criteria, the percentage of conformity was very similar to that reported by Marzano and Balzaretti () and even better than the conformity found by other authors (Legnani and others ; Domenech‐Sanchez and others ), who reported satisfactory results in less than 73% of analyzed samples. However, it must be pointed out that no significant differences were found between work and distribution utensils, in spite of the fact that the impact of dirtiness on the hygienic quality of the prepared meals could be higher in the second group, because microorganisms would be introduced into the final product that will not suffer any additional hygienic treatment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are currently no existing microbiological criteria in Spain for evaluating hygiene of surfaces in catering kitchens. In addition, no unified criteria were found among the various publications that were reviewed (Cosby et al, 2008;Forsythe & Hayes, 1998;Henroid, Mendonca, & Sneed, 2004;Marzano & Balzaretti, 2013;Sneed et al, 2004;Solberg et al, 1990). Therefore, a limit of ≤ 100 CFU/25 cm 2 (≤ 0.6 log 10 CFU/cm 2 ) was used in this study for determining that a work surface is clean, based on the experience of over 3000 surfaces analyzed in the catering business and on the fact that the Rodac plate count method does not provide reliable results when the count exceeds 100 CFU/plate (25 cm 2 ).…”
Section: Assessment Of Surfaces Hygienementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid disease outbreaks in the school environment and the consequent strain on student's health and learning, the latter authors state that staff training, in good practices related to food storage, handling and preparation is of fundamental importance. The immunity of children is relatively lower than that of adults (Marzano and Balzaretti 2013), so that protective measures against pathogenic agents potentially contaminating food in schools is specially relevant.…”
Section: Food Storagementioning
confidence: 99%