1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01039637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting fire fighters exposed in room fires: Comparison of results of bench scale test for thermal protection and conditions during room flashover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4). Firefighter PPE and thermal exposures [15,16] have described pre-flashover fire fighting environments with maximum heat fluxes between 5 kW/m 2 and 12 kW/m 2 . It was decided that laboratory experiments would be conducted at heat fluxes up to the lower end of the maximum range to ensure that the data collected from the helmet mounted HFM can be generalized to other similar training scenarios.…”
Section: Laboratory Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4). Firefighter PPE and thermal exposures [15,16] have described pre-flashover fire fighting environments with maximum heat fluxes between 5 kW/m 2 and 12 kW/m 2 . It was decided that laboratory experiments would be conducted at heat fluxes up to the lower end of the maximum range to ensure that the data collected from the helmet mounted HFM can be generalized to other similar training scenarios.…”
Section: Laboratory Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies [15,16] concerning firefighter PPE and thermal exposures in a fire environment have described pre-flashover fire fighting environments with temperatures ranging from 100°C (212°F) to 300°C (572°F) and maximum heat fluxes between 5 kW/m 2 and 12 kW/m 2 . However, these studies did not specifically focus on the firefighter's local environment in live-fire training scenarios, and the studied environments often contained fuel loads that were different than the wood-based products and straw often used in NFPA 1403 compliant training exercises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research by Montgomery [19] in 1975 indicated that in humid air rapid skin burns would occur at 100 ˚C (212 ˚F), and 150 ˚C (300 ˚F) was the exposure temperature at which escape was not likely. In 1947 Moritz [19] experimented on large animals and found that 100 ˚C (212 ˚F) represented the threshold for local burning and hyperemia (general burning).…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1947 Moritz [19] experimented on large animals and found that 100 ˚C (212 ˚F) represented the threshold for local burning and hyperemia (general burning). For this analysis, a temperature value of 100 ˚C (212 ˚F) was considered the temperature at which victims could be incapacitated.…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study that generated the heat transfer model followed an earlier effort at NIST that also focused on the protection of firefighters, and it received the 1989, Harry C. Bigglestone Award. This earlier paper by Krasny, Rocket, and Huang was entitled, ''Protecting Fire Fighters Exposed in Room Fires: Comparison of Results of Bench Scale Test for Thermal Protection and Conditions During Room Flashover'' [1]. The paper by Krasny et al, reported on a study that compared Thermal Protective Performance (TPP) test results from the National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 1971, Standard for Protective Clothing for Structural Fire Fighting, with test results from a series of large-scale room fire tests, conducted by NIST [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%