2020
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting Linear DNA Templates in Cell-Free Expression Systems from Diverse Bacteria

Abstract: Recent advances in cell-free systems have opened up new capabilities in synthetic biology from rapid prototyping of genetic circuits and metabolic pathways to portable diagnostics and biomanufacturing. A current bottleneck in cell-free systems, especially those employing non-E. coli bacterial species, is the required use of plasmid DNA, which can be laborious to construct, clone, and verify. Linear DNA templates offer a faster and more direct route for many cell-free applications, but they are often rapidly de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because of Ku's different mechanism for LET protection, it was proven to be the most effective in lysates made from diverse bacteria. In B. subtilis and C. glutamicum extracts, Ku-protected LETs improved transcription 4.43-and 1.58-fold, respectively, compared to the no inhibitor control (Yim et al, 2020). This is notable improvement, considering GamS and Chi DNA addition to C. glutamicum CFEs actually reduced RNA yield slightly.…”
Section: Nuclease Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, because of Ku's different mechanism for LET protection, it was proven to be the most effective in lysates made from diverse bacteria. In B. subtilis and C. glutamicum extracts, Ku-protected LETs improved transcription 4.43-and 1.58-fold, respectively, compared to the no inhibitor control (Yim et al, 2020). This is notable improvement, considering GamS and Chi DNA addition to C. glutamicum CFEs actually reduced RNA yield slightly.…”
Section: Nuclease Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ku binds directly to dsDNA termini and is proven to reduce degradation by AdnAB, a helicase/nuclease in mycobacteria ( Sinha et al, 2009 ). Ku has been used recently in E. coli CFEs to protect LETs and improved transcription significantly, but those yields were only about a third of those transcribed when using GamS or Chi DNA oligos as inhibitors ( Yim et al, 2020 ). However, because of Ku’s different mechanism for LET protection, it was proven to be the most effective in lysates made from diverse bacteria.…”
Section: Approaches For Stabilizing Linear Dna In Cell-free Expression Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the protein expression yield of LDET-based cell-free systems with GamS is only one-third of plasmid-based cell-free systems ( Sun et al, 2014 ). There were also several studies focusing on DNA-binding proteins, such as Ku ( Yim et al, 2020 ) and scCro ( Zhu et al, 2020 ), to block the binding of native nucleases. There is still much room for improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include using the λ-phage GamS protein (Sitaraman et al 2004) or DNA containing Chi sites (Marshall et al 2017) to inhibit the RecBCD exonuclease complex. Protecting the linear DNA ends by DNA binding proteins has also been successful (Yim et al 2020;Norouzi, Panfilov, and Pardee 2021;Zhu et al 2020), as has the chemical modification of linear DNA ends (McSweeney and Styczynski 2021). All these methods still require supplementation of the extract with additional time-and cost-intensive components or modification of the template to achieve expression from linear DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%