2009
DOI: 10.1080/09518960903488055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting the city's interest: the Greek Orthodox and the conflict between municipal andvilayetauthorities in İzmir (Smyrna) in the Second Constitutional Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Eldem (2009) specifically excludes the middle classes, who often were neither particularly mobile nor involved in the different types of exchanges which characterised the ‘cosmopolitan’ interactions of either the elites or the underclass. While this may be partly borne out by the different professional trajectories of the different groups, it might also be the result of the emergence of a particular type of sociability and public sphere, namely, in taverns and pubs ( birahane ) or, for the high bourgeoisie, respectively, in modern hotels and clubs (Kechriotis, 2009). What Eldem seems to ignore is that much of the (male) population of many Ottoman towns enjoyed other types of sociability which formed an important aspect of ensuring social integration.…”
Section: ‘Conviviality’ and The Ottoman Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Eldem (2009) specifically excludes the middle classes, who often were neither particularly mobile nor involved in the different types of exchanges which characterised the ‘cosmopolitan’ interactions of either the elites or the underclass. While this may be partly borne out by the different professional trajectories of the different groups, it might also be the result of the emergence of a particular type of sociability and public sphere, namely, in taverns and pubs ( birahane ) or, for the high bourgeoisie, respectively, in modern hotels and clubs (Kechriotis, 2009). What Eldem seems to ignore is that much of the (male) population of many Ottoman towns enjoyed other types of sociability which formed an important aspect of ensuring social integration.…”
Section: ‘Conviviality’ and The Ottoman Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of the 19th century, a system of city councils was introduced that initially incorporated representatives of quarters, religious communities and guilds, that is, the alliance groups that are of interest here. These different forms of urban representation, where urban politics were negotiated between different sectors of the population and Ottoman representatives, have received some scholarly attention (Ilbert, 1996; Kechriotis, 2009). The changes introduced in the context of the Tanzimat reforms, as well as colonial influence, altered the nature of local representation to the extent that in some cities Ottoman-installed councils took over many of the functions exercised earlier by the alliance groups.…”
Section: Fields Of Organised Convivial Interaction In the Ottoman Empirementioning
confidence: 99%