2023
DOI: 10.21037/jss-22-116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting the spinal cord during thoracic endovascular aortic repair—who should place the spinal drain?

Abstract: A well-placed and functioning lumbar spinal drain, for spinal cord protection, is an important aspect of the perioperative care of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures. Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating complication of TEVAR procedures and is most often associated with Crawford type 2 repairs. Current evidence-based guidelines for the surgical management of patients with thoracic aortic disease include the role of lumbar spine catheter placement and drainage of cer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SCI protection protocols often benefit from a multimodal approach in preventing spinal cord injury, including staging with temporary aneurysm sac perfusion (TASP), permissive hypertension, and CSFD (prophylactic or emergency) [ 32 , 33 ]. Additionally, other pre-operative staging techniques such as minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization (MISACE) may be related to improved spinal cord collateralization leading to reduced SCI rates [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCI protection protocols often benefit from a multimodal approach in preventing spinal cord injury, including staging with temporary aneurysm sac perfusion (TASP), permissive hypertension, and CSFD (prophylactic or emergency) [ 32 , 33 ]. Additionally, other pre-operative staging techniques such as minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization (MISACE) may be related to improved spinal cord collateralization leading to reduced SCI rates [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%