2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.94.012329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting weak measurements against systematic errors

Abstract: In this work, we consider the systematic error of quantum metrology by weak measurements under decoherence. We derive the systematic error of maximum likelihood estimation in general to the first-order approximation of a small deviation in the probability distribution, and study the robustness of standard weak measurement and postselected weak measurements against systematic errors. We show that, with a large weak value, the systematic error of a postselected weak measurement when the probe undergoes decoheren… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, this means the device will detect a frequency that is different from the true frequency by some constant offset. In the WVA interferometer, the frequency readout is amplified while the bias offset error is not, so the error is suppressed [43].…”
Section: A Bias Offset Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, this means the device will detect a frequency that is different from the true frequency by some constant offset. In the WVA interferometer, the frequency readout is amplified while the bias offset error is not, so the error is suppressed [43].…”
Section: A Bias Offset Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of this amplification can be quantified by the so-called weak value defined as , where and are the pre-and post-selection states of the QS. When these two state vectors are (nearly) orthogonal, and their overlapping is small, the weak value can significantly exceed the normal eigenvalue and lead to an amplified meter shift to overcome certain environmental disturbances [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Specifically, the ultra-small transversal shift of a beam can be observed when WVA is introduced [ 10 , 11 ], and the longitudinal optical phase can be precisely measured when an imaginary weak value is explored [ 12 , 13 ]; what is more, the optical Kerr effect in a single-photon level can also be amplified through WVA [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several discussions about the effect of technical noise on WVA systems' Fisher information [30]- [35] . Some optimization schemes to improve the measurement performance have been proposed [36] [44]. We start from a more practical perspective, to comprehensively consider the sensitivity and the effects of noises in the experiments, and to quantitatively analyze the measurement precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%